Myrtle Falls

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Myrtle Falls

Postby johnd on Sun Jun 05, 2005 9:57 pm

Well I've borrowed a tripod and had my first go at a waterfall.

Image


Image data is: D70, 18-70 kit lens at 22mm, f5.6, 2.5 secs, manual mode, spot metered.

A number of shots had the flowing white water badly over exposed and this was about the best of them. Can anyone please help me with a technique that I can use to stop the white water from getting over exposed but won't darken the whole shot. This is my first attempt at raw and I spent a while playing around with the raw data but can't seem to get a compromise between washed out white water and shadows on some of the other shots.

Cheers
John
Last edited by johnd on Mon Jun 06, 2005 4:11 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
johnd
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1342
Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2005 2:14 pm
Location: Sandy Bay, Tas.

Postby Aussie Dave on Sun Jun 05, 2005 10:17 pm

Hi John
I like the shot, particularly the log in the bottom right corner that leads you into the picture.

Which part of the scene did you expose to (using spot metering) ??

You could maybe try the aperture at something around f8 for a slightly crisper shot, but I like it. Great first attempt !

Perhaps posting the photo a little larger will have more impact as well ??
Dave
Nikon D7000 | 18-105 VR Lens | Nikon 50 1.8G | Sigma 70-300 APO II Super Macro | Tokina 11-16 AT-X | Nikon SB-800 | Lowepro Mini Trekker AWII
Photography = Compromise
User avatar
Aussie Dave
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1427
Joined: Sun Nov 21, 2004 1:40 pm
Location: West. Suburbs, Melbourne [Nikon D7000]

Postby mudder on Sun Jun 05, 2005 10:21 pm

G'day John,

If this is just the one exposure then you've done better than I have. :lol: Waterfalls can have a wide dynamic range so I've ended up taking two exposures and blending them in PS.

Good ol' RAW is very handy for exposure latitude tho huh...
Aka Andrew
User avatar
mudder
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3020
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 5:58 pm
Location: Melbourne - Burwood East

Postby johnd on Sun Jun 05, 2005 10:34 pm

Dave and Mudder, thanks for your comments. I metered about 1/3 way in from left hand side.

As for posting larger pics, I'm having a bit of trouble.
I'm using pixspot and I uploaded this as a 800pix X 600pix shot, quality 8, 198KB up to pixspot, but when I view it here, it's 500 X 400 and 56KB.
I think it's pixspot that's downsizing the shot. Not sure what to do about it.

Mudder, don't know how to blend two shots in PS yet. Got to learn that soon though. :)

Cheers
John
User avatar
johnd
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1342
Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2005 2:14 pm
Location: Sandy Bay, Tas.

Postby stephen on Sun Jun 05, 2005 10:37 pm

Im still blown away that you guys get two, three, four shots and blend them together thats amazing in my books
stephen
Member
 
Posts: 232
Joined: Mon May 23, 2005 10:10 pm
Location: Perth WA

Postby mudder on Sun Jun 05, 2005 10:43 pm

johnd wrote:... Mudder, don't know how to blend two shots in PS yet. Got to learn that soon though. :)

Cheers
John


G'day mate,

Just about to bugger off to watch the grand prix but blending is really easy in PS... This might sound like a lengthy procedure but once you've done it a couple of times it lierally only takes a few seconds and it takes care of the tricky areas like foliage etc...

1) open both the low exposure and high exposure images,
2) make the low exposure image current
3) ^A (to select all) then ^C (to copy to buffer)
4) make high exposure image current
5) ^V to paste the low exposure image into the high exposure image
6) Go to layers, make sure the pasted low exposure layer is current
then make a mask but clicking the icon that looks like a camera from
the front (didn't know how else to explain it...)
7) Alt-click on the mask window (the white window in the pasted layer
pallette) This should give you a white screen/image
8 ) Then paste into the white screen, this should give you a black and
white image
9) Then just click on the background layer to make it current and hey
presto! Merged exposures...
10) Then you can make the mask layer current and hide the background
and clean up erasing any bits of the mask you don't want... PS. Edit: forgot to add, you can do this with the one shot too, by using different levels of exposure to the same image and saving as two images for overlay... Assuming the highlights aren't blown to unrecoverable levels :)
Aka Andrew
User avatar
mudder
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3020
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 5:58 pm
Location: Melbourne - Burwood East

Postby Aussie Dave on Sun Jun 05, 2005 10:52 pm

johnd wrote:
As for posting larger pics, I'm having a bit of trouble.
I'm using pixspot and I uploaded this as a 800pix X 600pix shot, quality 8, 198KB up to pixspot, but when I view it here, it's 500 X 400 and 56KB.
I think it's pixspot that's downsizing the shot. Not sure what to do about it.


When you go to your pixspot gallery and click on the thumbnail, it opens up the photo....but usually you can click on the photo to see it at it's original size. From here is where I always take the URL link from.

Not sure if this is the reason you're photos are not showing up full size in here. Mine always do.
Dave
Nikon D7000 | 18-105 VR Lens | Nikon 50 1.8G | Sigma 70-300 APO II Super Macro | Tokina 11-16 AT-X | Nikon SB-800 | Lowepro Mini Trekker AWII
Photography = Compromise
User avatar
Aussie Dave
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1427
Joined: Sun Nov 21, 2004 1:40 pm
Location: West. Suburbs, Melbourne [Nikon D7000]

Postby phillipb on Sun Jun 05, 2005 11:00 pm

Just about to bugger off to watch the grand prix but blending is really easy


There's no grand prix tonight is there?
__________
Phillip


**Nikon D7000**
User avatar
phillipb
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2599
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 10:56 am
Location: Milperra (Sydney) **Nikon D7000**

Postby johnd on Mon Jun 06, 2005 2:24 pm

Andrew, thanks for the suggestion. :)
I'll try this tonight by making 2 shots from the 1 raw shot. One with the shadows brighter which will burn out the highlights and one the other way.

I'll let you know how I go.

Dave, yes I'm using the url from the photo not the thumbnail. But I think the problem is when I first upload it to pixspot.
It was 800X600 (198KB) on my PC, but after uploading, it was 500X400 (56KB). :?
When I tried to upload anything much larger, I got an upload error - too many pixels or something.
I'll have a play round and see what I come up with.

Cheers
John
User avatar
johnd
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1342
Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2005 2:14 pm
Location: Sandy Bay, Tas.

Postby Aussie Dave on Mon Jun 06, 2005 2:40 pm

johnd wrote:Dave, yes I'm using the url from the photo not the thumbnail. But I think the problem is when I first upload it to pixspot.
It was 800X600 (198KB) on my PC, but after uploading, it was 500X400 (56KB). :?
When I tried to upload anything much larger, I got an upload error - too many pixels or something.
I'll have a play round and see what I come up with.

Cheers
John


Hmmm....that's interesting as I typically upload photos that are 920 x 652 and they seem to work fine.
I know sometimes when the picture is larger, it does display smaller, but if you click on the image when it opens up in a new window, it then opens up again to the full size(at least it does when I use it).

Anyone else having similar problems ??
Dave
Nikon D7000 | 18-105 VR Lens | Nikon 50 1.8G | Sigma 70-300 APO II Super Macro | Tokina 11-16 AT-X | Nikon SB-800 | Lowepro Mini Trekker AWII
Photography = Compromise
User avatar
Aussie Dave
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1427
Joined: Sun Nov 21, 2004 1:40 pm
Location: West. Suburbs, Melbourne [Nikon D7000]

Postby johnd on Mon Jun 06, 2005 4:13 pm

Dave, you're a genius. :D The second click to open it up full size did the trick.

Thanks for your help.

Cheers
John
User avatar
johnd
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1342
Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2005 2:14 pm
Location: Sandy Bay, Tas.

Postby Aussie Dave on Mon Jun 06, 2005 4:21 pm

johnd wrote:Dave, you're a genius. :D The second click to open it up full size did the trick.

Thanks for your help.

Cheers
John


no problems...glad I could help :-)
Dave
Nikon D7000 | 18-105 VR Lens | Nikon 50 1.8G | Sigma 70-300 APO II Super Macro | Tokina 11-16 AT-X | Nikon SB-800 | Lowepro Mini Trekker AWII
Photography = Compromise
User avatar
Aussie Dave
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1427
Joined: Sun Nov 21, 2004 1:40 pm
Location: West. Suburbs, Melbourne [Nikon D7000]


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques