Some Pics from Glebe

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Some Pics from Glebe

Postby ozczecho on Tue Jun 07, 2005 1:14 am

Any critique, suggestion, help would be greatly appreciated from everyone.

The following shots were both taken with the kit lens, between a friends church service and wedding reception from around Glebe.

44mm, 1/500 - f/4.5, iso 400
Image


44mm, 1/640sec - f/11, iso 400
Image

Cheers

ozczecho.
User avatar
ozczecho
Senior Member
 
Posts: 785
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 9:41 pm
Location: Beecroft, Sydney

Postby Nnnnsic on Tue Jun 07, 2005 1:21 am

I like the 1st image.

The 2nd image is nice but it seems a tad too dark in the foreground and needs more details in the dark bits. :)
Producer & Editor @ GadgetGuy.com.au
Contributor for fine magazines such as PC Authority and Popular Science.
User avatar
Nnnnsic
I'm a jazz singer... so I know what I'm doing
 
Posts: 7770
Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2004 12:29 am
Location: Cubicle No. 42... somewhere in Bondi, NSW

Postby dooda on Tue Jun 07, 2005 3:27 am

Both photos have loads of potential.

The first one's inconsistant light doesn't help the image. Obviously there isn't much you can do about that, and you've composed well. The vine on the fence in the foreground isn't really working for me though.

The second one is dominated by the reflected light from the building in the city. If that's what you were going for then you succeeded. However the strength of the photo in my opinion looks to be that bridge with it's wires etc leading us into that city. Perhaps find an angle that allows us a clear unobstructed view of the bridge leading into the city (it disappears behind the palm tree), and watch your exposure, as it is a tad dark.

I hope this helps and looking forward to more photos.
love's first sighs are wisdom's last

Dave
http://www.flickr.com/photos/elton/
User avatar
dooda
Party Animal
 
Posts: 1591
Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2004 11:47 am
Location: Vancouver, B.C. Canada

Postby Geoff on Tue Jun 07, 2005 9:28 am

I prefer the 1st image, the second one is distracted significantly by that reflection, without the reflection and a bit more contrast and exposure I think it'd be a really beautiful shot.
Geoff
Special Moments Photography
Nikon D700, 50mm 1.4, 85mm 1.4, 70-200 2.8VR, SB800 & some simple studio stuff.
User avatar
Geoff
Moderator
 
Posts: 7791
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 12:08 am
Location: Freshwater - Northern Beaches, Sydney.

Postby Matt. K on Tue Jun 07, 2005 9:29 am

Nice to see you using the light. It always sets the mood.
Regards

Matt. K
User avatar
Matt. K
Former Outstanding Member Of The Year and KM
 
Posts: 9981
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2004 7:12 pm
Location: North Nowra

Postby ozczecho on Tue Jun 07, 2005 10:15 pm

Guys,

Thanks for the viewing and suggestions. I am learning PP in NC and PS and tweaked both images.

dooda, thanks for the suggestion re: capturing the whole bridge...also I couldn't get rid off the light reflection off the building. Is there something I can to in Photo Shop to tame it a little?

Geoff, I'll play around a bit more with the contrast in PS....

Again thanks everyone.
User avatar
ozczecho
Senior Member
 
Posts: 785
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 9:41 pm
Location: Beecroft, Sydney

Postby Geoff on Tue Jun 07, 2005 11:14 pm

ozczecho wrote:Guys,

Thanks for the viewing and suggestions. I am learning PP in NC and PS and tweaked both images.

dooda, thanks for the suggestion re: capturing the whole bridge...also I couldn't get rid off the light reflection off the building. Is there something I can to in Photo Shop to tame it a little?

Geoff, I'll play around a bit more with the contrast in PS....

Again thanks everyone.


Hello mate,
it's fun learning PS, and I'm enjoying PS2 (except for bridge) lots...I had a go at trying to tame your reflection a little with no luck..having said that I spent about 2 mins trying a few ideas, mainly selecting it with the lasoo tool and then changing exposure, but (and others please correct me if I'm wrong) - this is a true highlight and I'm not sure that there's really anything you can do to 'fix' it. On the other hand, this is all very subjective, some people like the bright reflection on this building in the middle, and some think it detracts from a great shot. Is there a right answer? No, not really. That's one of the things I love most about this forum, people are open and honest about how they 'rate' and view a photo and the author accepts that there is no real right or wrong...keep up with the great work and submit some more :). We're all here to learn.
Geoff
Special Moments Photography
Nikon D700, 50mm 1.4, 85mm 1.4, 70-200 2.8VR, SB800 & some simple studio stuff.
User avatar
Geoff
Moderator
 
Posts: 7791
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 12:08 am
Location: Freshwater - Northern Beaches, Sydney.

Postby ozczecho on Wed Jun 08, 2005 12:13 am

Geoff, I got dodgy results as well in trying to tame the reflection. Few people at work saw the photo and actually commented positively on it, so I thought I'd throw it on the forum for futher critique.

Cheers

Mike
User avatar
ozczecho
Senior Member
 
Posts: 785
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 9:41 pm
Location: Beecroft, Sydney

Postby gstark on Wed Jun 08, 2005 7:39 am

ozczecho wrote:dooda, thanks for the suggestion re: capturing the whole bridge...also I couldn't get rid off the light reflection off the building.


Do you have a CPL ?

I suspect that one may have been able to assist here, although to what extent, I don't know.
g.
Gary Stark
Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
User avatar
gstark
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22918
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Bondi, NSW


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques