seeing the whole picture?

Have your say on issues related to using a DSLR camera.

Moderator: Moderators

Forum rules
Please ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

seeing the whole picture?

Postby chris1968 on Tue Jun 07, 2005 7:04 pm

one thing that bugged me on the good old film based 35mm slrs was that 100% coverage in the viewfinder was only ever found on pro-spec models, unlike faster shutter speeds, faster frames per second etc it never filtered down to the consumer models.

Now, on the vast majority of DSLRs they are using a sensor way smaller than a 35mm frame so, to my tiny mind i figured the manufacturers would use the prism's from older 35mm consumer models (which gave say 95% coverage on 35mm) on the DSLRs as, given the smaller size of the sensor v 35mm frame, they'd surely give 100% viewfinder coverage?

To me thats a more valuable improvement than increasing burst rate - i never find landscape or stil life moving that quick :D
User avatar
chris1968
Member
 
Posts: 151
Joined: Sun Jun 05, 2005 2:04 am
Location: Dark Side of the Moors. West Yorks. England.....D70

Postby gstark on Tue Jun 07, 2005 8:27 pm

Chris,

The answer is no, and it's, from what i can gather, purely a cost and weight reduction measure.

Consumer level DSLRs don't even have a pentaprism - they have a pentamirror. That includes the D50, D70, the Dribble, and I think the 20D as well. Don't know about the Pentax, but if I could be bothered it'd be a 2 minute Google to find out.

Alas, I can't. :)
g.
Gary Stark
Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
User avatar
gstark
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22918
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Bondi, NSW


Return to General Discussion