My Tamron 70-300mm just won't take good photos!

Have your say on issues related to using a DSLR camera.

Moderator: Moderators

Forum rules
Please ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

My Tamron 70-300mm just won't take good photos!

Postby owen on Wed Jun 08, 2005 9:25 am

Hey guys. I have previously had trouble taking shots in macro mode with this lens and the other day I was down at the beach trying to get some simple shots of birds.

I was using it mainly at the 300mm length, however my shots at ISO 200 were coming out blurry so I set it to Auto ISO and still were blurry, so I set it manually to ISO 800 to hopefully get a higher shutter speed... guess what... still blurry. I was shooting in Aperture priority and set to wide open which is 6 at 300mm.

The lens is pretty good at the 70mm range - I've done a few portraits at that length, however I just can't get it right.

Any advice? I know it's a cheap lens... but I should get better shots out of it.
User avatar
owen
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1699
Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 3:21 pm
Location: Nowra, NSW

Postby Hlop on Wed Jun 08, 2005 9:29 am

Owen,

At 300mm you'll need a tripod to get a sharp macro. AF-C might help. Also, depending on subject, closest object mode helps sometimes
Mikhail
Hasselblad 501CM, XPAN, Wista DX 4x5, Pentax 67, Nikon D70, FED-2
User avatar
Hlop
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1355
Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 9:27 am
Location: Singapore

Postby owen on Wed Jun 08, 2005 9:32 am

I was experimenting with the closest focus subject thingo as well, and had no luck... but I wasn't in macro mode, I was just in normal mode for the bird shots.
User avatar
owen
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1699
Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 3:21 pm
Location: Nowra, NSW

Postby sheepie on Wed Jun 08, 2005 9:37 am

were they blurry 'out of focus' or blurry 'birds moved'?
sounds like a silly question I know, but at that length and aperture, my guess is your shutter speed was too low for fast-moving birds.

can you let us know what shutter speed the shots went off at?

other than that, I have no experience with that lens so can't really help :/
*** When getting there is half the fun! ***
User avatar
sheepie
Key Member
 
Posts: 3029
Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2004 11:56 am
Location: Picnic Point, Sydney Australia *** Nikon D200/D70 ***

Postby Greg B on Wed Jun 08, 2005 9:48 am

owen, I have that lens, and while it isn't in the same league as a Nikkor VR for the longer stuff, or dedicated macro for the macro stuff, you can get very satisfactory results.

So - and don't take this the wrong way - unless you have a distinctly dodgy lens, the problem is with what you are doing. The very good news about that is that it can be fixed :D :D :D
Greg - - - - D200 etc

Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius hits a target no one else can see.
- Arthur Schopenhauer
User avatar
Greg B
Moderator
 
Posts: 5938
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2004 7:14 pm
Location: Surrey Hills, Melbourne

Postby Photodude on Wed Jun 08, 2005 10:06 am

Owen,

I have the Tamron and often use it to take pics of flying seagulls etc down the beach. I get good results at 300 mm handheld.
Either your particular lens is no good or you need to up the shutter speed and make sure your not shaking the camera whilst panning for the birds.

Good luck :)

John
User avatar
Photodude
Member
 
Posts: 68
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 2:44 pm
Location: Wollongong

Postby Aussie Dave on Wed Jun 08, 2005 10:22 am

Hi Owen
my suggestion would be to make sure you use Shutter Priority, rather than Aperture Priority. You really need to control the effects of blurring, not necessarily Depth Of Field.

At 300mm, you will certainly want to be shooting (at least) 1/300th sec., if not faster (remember the crop factor of x1.5 - so the sensor is seeing an image displayed as 450mm, not 300mm).

Now, as this is a relatively "slow lens", starting at f6 @ 300mm, you are going to need alot of light in order to shoot at these shutter speeds....even with bumping the ISO up. This is the trade-off you get when buying a "budget lens"......

Perhaps take everyone's suggestions onboard and give them a go. If this still does not solve your problems, this may indicate a lens fault.
Dave
Nikon D7000 | 18-105 VR Lens | Nikon 50 1.8G | Sigma 70-300 APO II Super Macro | Tokina 11-16 AT-X | Nikon SB-800 | Lowepro Mini Trekker AWII
Photography = Compromise
User avatar
Aussie Dave
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1427
Joined: Sun Nov 21, 2004 1:40 pm
Location: West. Suburbs, Melbourne [Nikon D7000]

Postby leek on Wed Jun 08, 2005 10:44 am

We might be able to suggest more options if you post one of the dodgy photos along with the EXIF data...
Cheers, John
Leek@Flickr | Leek@RedBubble | Leek@DeviantArt

D700; D200; Tokina 12-24; Nikkor 50mm f1.4,18-70mm,85mm f1.8, 105mm,80-400VR, SB-800s; G1227LVL; RRS BH-55; Feisol 1401
User avatar
leek
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3135
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 4:46 pm
Location: Lane Cove, Sydney

Postby owen on Wed Jun 08, 2005 11:14 am

Hey guys, I don't have any photos here with me at work, and I think I may have only one or two at home. ANyway I do need to try shooting in shutter priority mode, that might give me better results.

The shots that were most in focus the birds appeared to be quite soft... and this was in the middle of a sunny day too. I'll post some examples later on today.

Thanks for the ideas.

Owen.
User avatar
owen
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1699
Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 3:21 pm
Location: Nowra, NSW

Postby Aussie Dave on Wed Jun 08, 2005 1:39 pm

owen wrote:The shots that were most in focus the birds appeared to be quite soft... and this was in the middle of a sunny day too. I'll post some examples later on today.

Thanks for the ideas.

Owen.


Most lenses, especially the budget lenses, will be soft at the 300mm extreme. I know when I shoot with my Sigma 70-300, I have to be vary wary of what shutter speeds I am shooting at, and always try to lean against something to steady the shot (if not using a tripod).
Dave
Nikon D7000 | 18-105 VR Lens | Nikon 50 1.8G | Sigma 70-300 APO II Super Macro | Tokina 11-16 AT-X | Nikon SB-800 | Lowepro Mini Trekker AWII
Photography = Compromise
User avatar
Aussie Dave
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1427
Joined: Sun Nov 21, 2004 1:40 pm
Location: West. Suburbs, Melbourne [Nikon D7000]

Postby ozimax on Thu Jun 09, 2005 10:45 pm

I use the 300mm extensively with reasonable results (you'll have to ask others for that one I suppose), just experiment and get as much light as you can.

I would definitely like a Nikkor 600mm superdoopersportsfantastic lens one day but I don't want to mortgage my four kids to do so!

Max :D
President, A.A.A.A.A (Australian Association Against Acronym Abuse)
Canon EOS R6, RF 24-105 F4, RF 70-200 F4, RF 35mm F1.8, RF 16mm F2.8
"And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." (John 8:32)
User avatar
ozimax
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5289
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2005 11:58 am
Location: Coffs Harbour, NSW

Postby johndec on Thu Jun 09, 2005 10:49 pm

I've got a Tamron 70-300 and it can be a bit Jekyll and Hyde. I've had some very sharp shots at 300mm, but others didn't quite work. If you pay VERY close attention to your settings, it will do the job for you.
If I'm alone in a forest and my wife is not around to hear what I say, am I still wrong ??
User avatar
johndec
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1327
Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2004 11:24 pm
Location: Sans Souci, Sydney...D200....

Postby Neeper on Tue Jun 14, 2005 3:56 pm

I have this lens as well. And I get different results sometimes too. Good thing for the USM :)
Johnny
D200, D70, 18-70mm, 85mm 1.8, 50mm 1.8, 24-120mm VR, 12-24mm Tokina, 70-300mm Tamron, Lens Baby 2.0, Peleng Fisheye 8mm, SB800, Alien Bees Studio Setup: 1 B400, 2 B800, 1 B1600, Sekonic L-358
http://www.jtimagesonline.com
User avatar
Neeper
Member
 
Posts: 352
Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2005 5:06 pm
Location: Calgary, Alberta Canada

Postby owen on Tue Jun 14, 2005 4:37 pm

Hey guys, an update on this. I went out yesterday and set the camera to shutter priority mode with the shutter speed at 400, and also had Auto ISO set and I was getting much better results. It still doens't really focus quick enough to get good shots of birds, however I am not so scared to use it now.

Here's a shot that was taken in macro mode, hand held:

Image

This was at ISO 1600 and noise levels are really surprising... just the DOF is very shallow.

Anyway, previously this kind of shot would have been an unsharp mess, now it at least has some definition.

Thanks for the help.
User avatar
owen
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1699
Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 3:21 pm
Location: Nowra, NSW

Hi

Postby yeocsa on Tue Jun 14, 2005 4:42 pm

Hi Owen,

Please some pictures along with EXIF.

As your lens goes to f6 at the 300 end, AF would be slow to respond. If the birds are flying pretty fast and the light levels aren't high, you would not get very sharp pictures naturally.

It is not an ISO problem rather the AF of the camera and lens just could not reach that level of performance at f6.

To use the combo for birding, position yourself such that you have good direct light onto the birds. This way, you will have higher chances of getting good pictures. The best time time is sunny blue skies.

regards,

Arthur
yeocsa
Senior Member
 
Posts: 966
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 12:04 pm
Location: Melbourne

Re: Hi

Postby Aussie Dave on Tue Jun 14, 2005 8:10 pm

yeocsa wrote:Hi Owen,

Please some pictures along with EXIF.

As your lens goes to f6 at the 300 end, AF would be slow to respond. If the birds are flying pretty fast and the light levels aren't high, you would not get very sharp pictures naturally.

It is not an ISO problem rather the AF of the camera and lens just could not reach that level of performance at f6.

To use the combo for birding, position yourself such that you have good direct light onto the birds. This way, you will have higher chances of getting good pictures. The best time time is sunny blue skies.

regards,

Arthur


good advice Arthur !

Owen , good to hear you experienced some improvement from your previous attempts with that lens, using suggestions offered up by the members on this forum. Without spending oodles of money on superior lenses, you'll be behind the 8-ball is some situation, but if you keep working at it you will soon get to know what you can and cannot do with the lens and should be able to maximise it to it's fullest.

Perhaps you can begin to dabble in "manual focussing" ??

Also, when using this lens in macro mode, the DOF you'll be playing with will probably be counted in mm rather than feet or metres (which makes macro shooting something that requires a lot of practice) :-)
Dave
Nikon D7000 | 18-105 VR Lens | Nikon 50 1.8G | Sigma 70-300 APO II Super Macro | Tokina 11-16 AT-X | Nikon SB-800 | Lowepro Mini Trekker AWII
Photography = Compromise
User avatar
Aussie Dave
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1427
Joined: Sun Nov 21, 2004 1:40 pm
Location: West. Suburbs, Melbourne [Nikon D7000]

Postby owen on Tue Jun 14, 2005 8:59 pm

Yeah I'm pleased with the results, compared with what I used to get.

I'll try to post an image of the birdies soon, along with exif.
User avatar
owen
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1699
Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 3:21 pm
Location: Nowra, NSW

Postby owen on Tue Jun 14, 2005 9:22 pm

Image

EXIF:

1/400th
f/8
shutter priority
ISO 200
focal length: 300mm
User avatar
owen
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1699
Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 3:21 pm
Location: Nowra, NSW

Hi

Postby yeocsa on Tue Jun 14, 2005 10:02 pm

Hi Owen,

There's nothing wrong with your lens. You will need to understand more intimately the limitation and capability of your camera, lens and your skills.

From the picture you posted, assuming that you are using the centre focusing sensor, the focus is on the sky not on the birds. If you are using the outer sensors to focus on any one of the birds, the AF will have trouble keeping up. Only the centre sensor is a cross sensor (detecting vertical and horizontal). The AF will definitely hunt. If you use AFC, the result will be worst. Using manual focus could help but need greater handling skill required of you.

Did you pan the direction of the flight. If you do, it would help to keep one sensor (preferably the centre sensor) on one of the birds. Use continous frames so that you have a higher chance of getting the right shot.

To get good bird flights, you need to:-

1. move to a better location. i can see shadows cast by the sun. We don't want the shadows.

2. focus on one bird. one subject. one focal point. keep it simple.

3. get nearer to the bird. A bigger subject helps the AF to perform and allows your lens to capture the details. More would be expected of the lens if the subject get smaller - more resolving power is needed.

4. use the largest aperture your lens allow. use ISO 800. denoise as part of your post processing. Most bird shots require about f5.6 to f8.

5. practice with stationery birds first. if you can get the picture tact sharp at 300mm, then try taking flying birds. Use the centre AF to focus on the bird's eye and see if you can get the head sharp. Once you can do that, try manual focus, train your eyes to check the sharpness level through the viewfinder.

If you can do all 5 items listed, you will definitely see a marked improvements in your pictures.

regards,

Arthur
yeocsa
Senior Member
 
Posts: 966
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 12:04 pm
Location: Melbourne

Postby owen on Tue Jun 14, 2005 10:09 pm

Hi Arthur. Thanks for yet another detailed, instructive post. The focusing method for this shot was the closest subject setting... I figured the camera should be smart enough to tell that the birds are closer than the clouds.

I will definitely try your suggestions and see how I go. You guys that make up this forum are so helpful!
User avatar
owen
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1699
Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 3:21 pm
Location: Nowra, NSW


Return to General Discussion