photos from last night

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

photos from last night

Postby olrac on Sat Jun 25, 2005 11:30 pm

Image

I took this shot at Melb Botanical Gardens.

Just wondering how I can get sharper shots I took these with tamron 70 - 300

what other lenses will help get more detail especially around the eyes...

This I took this one out the front of my flat....

Image
User avatar
olrac
Member
 
Posts: 427
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 2:16 pm
Location: Richmond - VIC

Postby Aussie Dave on Sun Jun 26, 2005 7:33 am

olrac,
looking at the EXIF info from the first pic you posted, you shot this with your lens set to 220mm @ 1/50th of a sec. (I'm assuming handheld as well ??).

The light levels when you took this shot (6.05pm) would have been very low and even in good light, 1/50 sec. is way too slow a shutter speed to be using. This will be the reason for a soft and blurry photo.

With your 70-300, you need to make sure that the shutter speed (at least) matches your focal length, if not compensate a little more for good measure (to factor in the x1.5 crop factor).

At 220mm, you really wouldn't want to shoot under 1/200th sec. preferably 1/300th (or more) if you have enough light.

You will soon realise that this is virtually impossible with this lens at those light levels. To try and combat this, you can:
a) bump up the ISO - which probably won't help enough
b) use a tripod, slow shutter speed to expose correctly and perhaps even self timer or remote shutter
c) save your pennies for that 70-200 f2.8 VR lens
d) try using flash if the subject is close enough
e) keep taking grossly underexposed photos...

Depending on the subject/scene, I usually try D and/or B 1st, then A. (I'm not allowed to try C :( )

When you shoot, you should always note in the viewfinder what the exposure meter is telling you. If it's a little off centre, a fine adjustment will help you, but if it's way over to the left or right, the shot ain't gonna come out good (under most situations).

Learn to read this and it will save you lots of heartache when you upload your prized shots to see darkened images....

Hope this helps :-)
Dave
Nikon D7000 | 18-105 VR Lens | Nikon 50 1.8G | Sigma 70-300 APO II Super Macro | Tokina 11-16 AT-X | Nikon SB-800 | Lowepro Mini Trekker AWII
Photography = Compromise
User avatar
Aussie Dave
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1427
Joined: Sun Nov 21, 2004 1:40 pm
Location: West. Suburbs, Melbourne [Nikon D7000]

Postby owen on Sun Jun 26, 2005 10:40 am

I recently figured out how to get better shots with this lens.

- put the camera into Shutter Priority mode and change the shutter speed to about 1/400 or so if you're going to be using it at full zoom.

- put the camera into ISO Auto mode, this way it will adjust the ISO level until you have the correct exposure at 1/400th of a second.

- don't expect miracles as this is a pretty cheap lens, however it can give pretty good results.
User avatar
owen
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1699
Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 3:21 pm
Location: Nowra, NSW

Postby olrac on Mon Jun 27, 2005 10:50 am

Are there any other lenses I should look at other than the 70 - 200 VR?

What is a good price for the VR lens?
User avatar
olrac
Member
 
Posts: 427
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 2:16 pm
Location: Richmond - VIC

Postby MCWB on Mon Jun 27, 2005 4:20 pm

olrac wrote:What is a good price for the VR lens?

You're looking around $2300 imported, plus any GST applicable. Vanbar have it locally for $2940.14. I won't suggest alternatives as I might seem biased.
User avatar
MCWB
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2121
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 10:55 pm
Location: Epping/CBD, Sydney-D200, D70

Postby olrac on Mon Jun 27, 2005 4:33 pm

let me guess a AF Nikkor 80-200 1:2.8 D ED

hahahaha

I am considering this (also trying to convince the better half)
User avatar
olrac
Member
 
Posts: 427
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 2:16 pm
Location: Richmond - VIC

Postby PiroStitch on Mon Jun 27, 2005 4:45 pm

As mentioned before, if it's getting low light, use a tripod or bump up the ISO for the duck photo...unless you manage to find a way to freeze the duck in motion for about a second or so ;)

The city photo is fairly sharp, and I'm guessing you used a tripod? Otherwise you have some pretty steady hands for a 1" exposure. :D

The city photo would benefit greatly if it was a pano-style crop...remove the cars down the bottom as these don't do much for the photo. I'm not sure what result you were trying to achieve, but if you wanted the buildings to be brighter without blowing the sky, I'd suggest taking two photos and merging it together in photoshop. 1 - meter for the sky (buildings in silhouette), 2 - meter for the buildings (blowing the sky).
User avatar
PiroStitch
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4669
Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2005 1:08 am
Location: Hong Kong

Postby olrac on Mon Jun 27, 2005 4:55 pm

I like photos that look the way that i see them,

The city photo is basicly what I wanted. The thing i lik about the cars is that the colors of the sky are reflected on the side....

About 4 hours later (becuase I have to take the photos from the middle of the road to get the best view) I tried geting a pano of the city but that didnt work out too well i metered off the buildings so they would be well exposed but the luminated signs were all blown out i will have to try again on another clear night. BTW the duck shot was on a tripod.
User avatar
olrac
Member
 
Posts: 427
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 2:16 pm
Location: Richmond - VIC


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques