Brown Falcon - Take off at WTP

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Brown Falcon - Take off at WTP

Postby yeocsa on Mon Jun 27, 2005 9:28 pm

Image

D70 + AFS 300 F4 + TC1.4 + SB800. Handheld.

regards,

Arthur
yeocsa
Senior Member
 
Posts: 966
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 12:04 pm
Location: Melbourne

Postby stubbsy on Mon Jun 27, 2005 10:10 pm

Arthur

On my monitor this image looks a little odd. The feathers under the throat in particular look very blown. But then it may just be me :wink:
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything.
*** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
User avatar
stubbsy
Moderator
 
Posts: 10748
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
Location: Newcastle NSW - D700

Postby kipper on Mon Jun 27, 2005 10:21 pm

Nope you're right Stubbsy, they're blown. I took 8-10 shots of this bird and feel like crying :(

Even with it being shot in RAW I can't bring back the highlights and use Photomatix to try and combine them. It was a bit annoying as the sun had been hiding for most of the morning and was in about 30sec before the bird landed then the cloud shifted and it lit the bird up too much :x

I've got two that are pretty good. When in harsh sun I think you really need to be in spot metering so that you're exposing for the bird. I dunno what happened, I know I had my flash off and so did Nicole. However a few of my shots vary in exposure. Not sure if Arthur still had his flash on.
Darryl (aka Kipper)
Nikon D200
kipper
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3738
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 9:23 pm
Location: Hampshire, UK

Postby mudder on Mon Jun 27, 2005 10:57 pm

That would have been a hard catch in that light, I wouldn't have faired that well... Looking at the bird's feet makes me wonder if the focus was "behind" the eyes? Seems sharpest in the middle of the bird, hmmm might just be my eyes getting that bad :oops:
Aka Andrew
User avatar
mudder
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3020
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 5:58 pm
Location: Melbourne - Burwood East

HI

Postby yeocsa on Tue Jun 28, 2005 10:34 am

Hi Mudder,

Nope. Your eyes are okay. The falcon was about to take off when I had the chance to take this only picture. The head and wings are blurr due to the bird's movement.

The highlights are blown. However, I have the Raw version which i would be able to fix it.

regards,

Arthur
yeocsa
Senior Member
 
Posts: 966
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 12:04 pm
Location: Melbourne

Postby kipper on Tue Jun 28, 2005 11:28 am

You can to an extent Arthur but once a highlight is blown, it's blown - whether in RAW or not. Mine weren't that harshly blown, and I've tried shifting EV but you can see there isn't any detail in feathers when reducing the EV. It just appears a colored area.
Darryl (aka Kipper)
Nikon D200
kipper
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3738
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 9:23 pm
Location: Hampshire, UK

Hi

Postby yeocsa on Tue Jun 28, 2005 11:38 am

Hi Kipper,

That's why most of my images are underexposed. I usually dial -0.3EV and do post processing. I will have more problem if the subject is blacklight and will have to rely more on flash output.

Capturing near white is D70's weakness. It does not have as wide dynamic range as the more expensive bodies. This is the main problem i had when capturing Silver Gulls.

The picture i posted was a jpeg (i had used raw + jpg). In CS2, the software does a auto levels for the jpeg which resulted in the highlights being toasted.

regards,

Arthur
yeocsa
Senior Member
 
Posts: 966
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 12:04 pm
Location: Melbourne

Postby kipper on Tue Jun 28, 2005 12:13 pm

Yeah CS2 the ACR plugin was doing auto on some of my pictures and I was going "urgh, turn it off!". I agree when shooting light color objects it's a good idea dial down by 1/3 or 2/3. Just be careful with dark colored objects (eg. whistling kites). As adjusting the EV too much in NC or ACR can result in grainy images.
Darryl (aka Kipper)
Nikon D200
kipper
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3738
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 9:23 pm
Location: Hampshire, UK

Hi

Postby yeocsa on Tue Jun 28, 2005 12:33 pm

Hi Kipper,

Yes. I fully agree. Too much under exposure can result in more noise, loss of contrast and details.

regards,

Arthur
yeocsa
Senior Member
 
Posts: 966
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 12:04 pm
Location: Melbourne


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques