Bird on a bard wireModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
15 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Bird on a bard wireWater Treatment Plant Entrance. regards, Arthur
Great capture Arthur!
Btw, it's barb wire Unless the wire was reciting poetry...then that's a different story Just wondering, this is something the bird photographers would be able to answer, how come some of the birds even though they're still, still have their feathers appearing to be blurred? Is it just the shutter speed being slow or were the birds moving? Sorry not meaning to sound rude or criticse the bird images, but just wanted to know
HiI am not sure. The bird was chirping away. Could be camera shake too.
Picture is heavily cropped. 1/160 at f8. Focal Lenght 420mm. Handheld. Flash used. No chance to use tripod. Several pacific swallows flew away and only this guy remains. Managed at a snapshot before all is gone. regards, Arthur
Ahh gotcha Not a criticism against you or your photos Arthur It's just an observation I've noticed over the past few weeks. They are fast moving critters
Hi
Hi No worries. all comments welcome. it helps to sharpen my skills. appreciate your observation. cheers, Arthur
Really depends on the crop factor I find Piro.
I'd like to see how much the Canon guys crop using IS, because I've seen a lot of sharp shots of small critters. Then again most of them using 400, 500, 600 IS with TC. Darryl (aka Kipper)
Nikon D200
looks great arthur,
how much cropping was there on this pic? looks a bit soft on the head was it car vibration? Life's pretty straight without drifting
http://www.puredrift.com
Hi
Hi Redline, less than 20% of the picture i think. Softness is not due to car vibration. It is due to handholding and bird's movement. The bird was chirping and the body especially near the neck would expand. Shutter speed was very slow at 1/160 for focal lenght of 420mm. No time to up the speed as they all flew away very quickly. regards, Arthur
Yeocsa,
was there much wind around whilst taking the photograph? a moderate breeze would ruffle the feathers, especially as the bird has them puffed out. this may explain the slight blur?
I still think that is what it is. It also goes by the name of Horsfield's Bronze-Cuckoo. I think it was a combination of handholding at the shutter speed and cropping. It was a nice start to the morning. Nicole
Web Site
I know this sounds strange, but just looking at the cropping pic you showed, I think that the uncropped original or only slightly cropped version would look great!
Smile; it makes people wonder what you have been up to.
Previous topic • Next topic
15 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|