Managing Lens Lust

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Managing Lens Lust

Postby smac on Thu Jun 30, 2005 11:10 pm

As a new member I was intrigued to hear about lens lust, as I had not come across that particular expression before. Although I had not heard of it, I think I have a strong dose of it.

OK I will come straight out…my name is Stuart Macdonald and I am a “lensaholic”. I am never happy with the lens I have and always want a better one.

Now that I have admitted it, I need someone to tell me what lenses will make me happy. I need to have the “ideal” lenses (ideal meaning a good mix of quality and affordability).

I currently have the following lenses:

• AF-s 24-85 mm f/3.5-4.5 G (I am in the process of selling this lens)
• AF 70-300 mm f/4-5.6D ED (not overly impressed)

I was thinking of getting a AF-s 12-24 mm f/4G DX ED-IF for some true wide angle shots but don’t know what mid range zoom to get.

Also, should I keep the 70-300 or is there a better option.

Hoping to tap into the vast experience of the members here……..

Stuart Macdonald


'Tis better to have loved and lust than never to have lust at all.
User avatar
smac
Member
 
Posts: 342
Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2005 4:15 pm
Location: Baulkham Hills, Sydney

Re: Managing Lens Lust

Postby birddog114 on Thu Jun 30, 2005 11:13 pm

smac wrote:I currently have the following lenses:

• AF-s 24-85 mm f/3.5-4.5 G (I am in the process of selling this lens)
• AF 70-300 mm f/4-5.6D ED (not overly impressed)

I was thinking of getting a AF-s 12-24 mm f/4G DX ED-IF for some true wide angle shots but don’t know what mid range zoom to get.

Also, should I keep the 70-300 or is there a better option.

Hoping to tap into the vast experience of the members here……..

Stuart Macdonald




OK, here's the path to the lust:
- Get rid of your 24-85G and find a new home for your 70-300G
Start with 12-24DX and 24-120VR, last one with 70-200VR + TC 1.7.
Then you'll have a full range cover from 12-200 or 12 - 340 with TC.
Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
User avatar
birddog114
Senior Member
 
Posts: 15881
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 8:18 pm
Location: Belmore,Sydney

Postby smac on Thu Jun 30, 2005 11:17 pm

Did you mean I should get the 24-120VR AND the 70-200VR or should it be one OR the other??? [/quote]
'Tis better to have loved and lust than never to have lust at all.
User avatar
smac
Member
 
Posts: 342
Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2005 4:15 pm
Location: Baulkham Hills, Sydney

Postby birddog114 on Thu Jun 30, 2005 11:19 pm

smac wrote:Did you mean I should get the 24-120VR AND the 70-200VR or should it be one OR the other???
[/quote]

smac,
the 24-120VR and the 70-200VR are two difference lens and league.
get both of them.
Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
User avatar
birddog114
Senior Member
 
Posts: 15881
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 8:18 pm
Location: Belmore,Sydney

Postby johndec on Thu Jun 30, 2005 11:19 pm

He means both :lol:
If I'm alone in a forest and my wife is not around to hear what I say, am I still wrong ??
User avatar
johndec
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1327
Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2004 11:24 pm
Location: Sans Souci, Sydney...D200....

Postby smac on Thu Jun 30, 2005 11:24 pm

Feeding the lust can be dangerous, perhaps I will start with the 12-24 and the 24-120 and hang on to the 70-300 hoping that the desire will subside....

Then when I realise that the lust is a disease that can't be controlled I will splash out for the 70-200VR

Do you think I could live with that?
'Tis better to have loved and lust than never to have lust at all.
User avatar
smac
Member
 
Posts: 342
Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2005 4:15 pm
Location: Baulkham Hills, Sydney

Postby big pix on Thu Jun 30, 2005 11:25 pm

from another forum, but it fits............

"Lust is a big problem, it doesn't matter if is over the next lens for your camera or
a woman, it is very expensive."

cheers
bp
Cheers ....bp....
Difference between a good street photographer and a great street photographer....
Removing objects that do not belong...
happy for the comments, but
.....Please DO NOT edit my image.....
http://bigpix.smugmug.com Forever changing
User avatar
big pix
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4513
Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 11:52 pm
Location: Lake Macquarie NSW.

Postby birddog114 on Thu Jun 30, 2005 11:27 pm

smac wrote:Feeding the lust can be dangerous, perhaps I will start with the 12-24 and the 24-120 and hang on to the 70-300 hoping that the desire will subside....

Then when I realise that the lust is a disease that can't be controlled I will splash out for the 70-200VR

Do you think I could live with that?


smac,
Start something with light dose first ( 12-24 + 24-120) and if the lust still persist then get the 70200VR for heavy dose treatment
Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
User avatar
birddog114
Senior Member
 
Posts: 15881
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 8:18 pm
Location: Belmore,Sydney

Postby johndec on Thu Jun 30, 2005 11:29 pm

smac wrote:Feeding the lust can be dangerous, perhaps I will start with the 12-24 and the 24-120 and hang on to the 70-300 hoping that the desire will subside....

Then when I realise that the lust is a disease that can't be controlled I will splash out for the 70-200VR

Do you think I could live with that?


For a while, until you see a 200-400VR :shock:
If I'm alone in a forest and my wife is not around to hear what I say, am I still wrong ??
User avatar
johndec
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1327
Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2004 11:24 pm
Location: Sans Souci, Sydney...D200....

Postby smac on Thu Jun 30, 2005 11:30 pm

Birddog,

Thank you....just what I needed.....you have satisfied my lust....in fact if I was a smoker I would be lying back enjoying a cigarette right now....
'Tis better to have loved and lust than never to have lust at all.
User avatar
smac
Member
 
Posts: 342
Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2005 4:15 pm
Location: Baulkham Hills, Sydney

Postby smac on Thu Jun 30, 2005 11:32 pm

There's a 200-400VR !!!!!! Does it ever end, luckily my son is doing psychology at Macquarie....perhaps he will come up with a cure.
'Tis better to have loved and lust than never to have lust at all.
User avatar
smac
Member
 
Posts: 342
Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2005 4:15 pm
Location: Baulkham Hills, Sydney

Postby johndec on Thu Jun 30, 2005 11:34 pm

And of course you will just HAVE to have a 50mm and/or 85mm 1.4 prime AND of course a 105mm macro AND no kit is complete without a fisheye lens.... Now lets get started on Flash and camera body lust... of course you'll need a good tripod and head, there goes another grand, etc,etc,...

Hehe, it never ends... Just smile and hand over your credit card :lol: :lol:
If I'm alone in a forest and my wife is not around to hear what I say, am I still wrong ??
User avatar
johndec
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1327
Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2004 11:24 pm
Location: Sans Souci, Sydney...D200....

Postby phillipb on Thu Jun 30, 2005 11:41 pm

There is only one known cure for lens lust.... Poverty
__________
Phillip


**Nikon D7000**
User avatar
phillipb
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2599
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 10:56 am
Location: Milperra (Sydney) **Nikon D7000**

Postby WadeM on Thu Jun 30, 2005 11:47 pm

Birddog, you should carry a warning handing out such good, but costly advice :lol:

--Wadem
WadeM
Member
 
Posts: 135
Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2005 10:36 pm
Location: .syd.au.

Postby leek on Thu Jun 30, 2005 11:55 pm

Don't forget the 80-400VR as a cheaper alternative to the 70-200VR + TC...

I bought the 400VR and can only say that you will forget the 70-300 after you have tried this... While I know that the 70-200VR is a mighty fine lens, I think that my optimal collection will be:
12-24mm
24-120 VR
80-400 VR

plus a couple of primes 50mm and the 105mm Micro...

and maybe a 1.7TC on top of that...

If I had all of those, then I could finally sell my kit lens...

Ah... but then there's the tripod... and the ball-head and the Hard Disk unit... and the... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ...
Cheers, John
Leek@Flickr | Leek@RedBubble | Leek@DeviantArt

D700; D200; Tokina 12-24; Nikkor 50mm f1.4,18-70mm,85mm f1.8, 105mm,80-400VR, SB-800s; G1227LVL; RRS BH-55; Feisol 1401
User avatar
leek
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3135
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 4:46 pm
Location: Lane Cove, Sydney

Postby Paul on Fri Jul 01, 2005 12:17 am

smac wrote:Feeding the lust can be dangerous, perhaps I will start with the 12-24 and the 24-120 and hang on to the 70-300 hoping that the desire will subside....
?

No it never subsides, it haunts us all in our dreams.. :twisted:
I would recomend the 24-120VR as a great utility lens for every day use, the 12-24 is one I would love to have as well as the 70-200VR.
Just need to win lotto or get a second job, bank loan, sell body parts.. :roll:
Nikon F80D, FM2n
RRS BH-55, 055XPROB
Smugmug
User avatar
Paul
Senior Member
 
Posts: 866
Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2004 8:32 am
Location: Baulkham Hills, NSW, Australia

Postby birddog114 on Fri Jul 01, 2005 7:17 am

smac,
Pls. take it slowly! it's a long winding road ahead. See the harvest with your labour first and enjoy it.
God! who knows! one day you'll have all the mighty lenses in your hand as your treatment keep going on and never stop.
Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
User avatar
birddog114
Senior Member
 
Posts: 15881
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 8:18 pm
Location: Belmore,Sydney

attachment

Postby rjlhughes on Fri Jul 01, 2005 8:17 am

and it's the attachment to our desires that causes suffering, of course
Bob

"It is always the instantaneous reaction to oneself that produces a photograph." Robert Frank

http://www.flickr.com/photos/rjlhughes/
User avatar
rjlhughes
Member
 
Posts: 364
Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2005 9:39 pm
Location: SYD Inner West/NSW Central West

Postby Oneputt on Fri Jul 01, 2005 8:19 am

It is a sad affiliction that is for sure. On top of the 80-400VR I bought from Birddog I have now added the 70-200VR 2.8. Got to stop, got to stop, got to stop....................................................................
User avatar
Oneputt
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3174
Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2005 3:58 pm
Location: Stuck in traffic Maroochydore.

Re: attachment

Postby birddog114 on Fri Jul 01, 2005 8:20 am

rjlhughes wrote:and it's the attachment to our desires that causes suffering, of course


Agreed! but then will exchange the suffering with happiness if you can jusify them :wink:
Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
User avatar
birddog114
Senior Member
 
Posts: 15881
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 8:18 pm
Location: Belmore,Sydney

Postby birddog114 on Fri Jul 01, 2005 8:22 am

Oneputt wrote:It is a sad affiliction that is for sure. On top of the 80-400VR I bought from Birddog I have now added the 70-200VR 2.8. Got to stop, got to stop, got to stop....................................................................


Oneputt,
There's another 200-400VR waiting within your desire in the near future, then a D2x or D90 or D200 or D3x will flow smoothly in your life without any notice of the suffering. :lol:
Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
User avatar
birddog114
Senior Member
 
Posts: 15881
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 8:18 pm
Location: Belmore,Sydney

Postby Oneputt on Fri Jul 01, 2005 9:09 am

Birddog I don't need any encouragement from you thanks :lol:
User avatar
Oneputt
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3174
Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2005 3:58 pm
Location: Stuck in traffic Maroochydore.

Postby huynhie on Fri Jul 01, 2005 9:14 am

Oneputt wrote:Birddog I don't need any encouragement from you thanks :lol:


The sad part is Birddogs prices are so cheap, that you would be silly not to buy it :shock:
User avatar
huynhie
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1476
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 12:11 pm
Location: Sydney

Postby birddog114 on Fri Jul 01, 2005 9:20 am

Oneputt,
One bullet or ten bullets won't make difference to life isn't it? :lol:
If you can handle one bullet right to the heart so another 9 will flow in easy. :shock: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
User avatar
birddog114
Senior Member
 
Posts: 15881
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 8:18 pm
Location: Belmore,Sydney

Postby PiroStitch on Fri Jul 01, 2005 10:31 am

Birddog, that is just sick...sick sick sick and greatly disturbing :shock: :P :P
User avatar
PiroStitch
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4669
Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2005 1:08 am
Location: Hong Kong

Postby birddog114 on Fri Jul 01, 2005 10:38 am

PiroStitch wrote:Birddog, that is just sick...sick sick sick and greatly disturbing :shock: :P :P


Wayne,
Yes, I know and am sorry, but our life is that way!
Or with a full glass of water, if you have or try to top it up with few more drops into it, nothing will change isn't it?
Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
User avatar
birddog114
Senior Member
 
Posts: 15881
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 8:18 pm
Location: Belmore,Sydney

Postby Oneputt on Fri Jul 01, 2005 10:59 am

I agree Birddog, live is too short to stress about the little things. Now where did I put my cheque book.............................. :wink:
User avatar
Oneputt
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3174
Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2005 3:58 pm
Location: Stuck in traffic Maroochydore.

Postby smac on Fri Jul 01, 2005 11:13 am

I have just sold my 24-85 AF-s so what am I to do........???? Gotta get a fix real soon............

As they say ......tis better to have loved and lust than to never have lust at all.

Stuart
'Tis better to have loved and lust than never to have lust at all.
User avatar
smac
Member
 
Posts: 342
Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2005 4:15 pm
Location: Baulkham Hills, Sydney

Postby birddog114 on Fri Jul 01, 2005 11:17 am

smac wrote:I have just sold my 24-85 AF-s so what am I to do........???? Gotta get a fix real soon............

As they say ......tis better to have loved and lust than to never have lust at all.

Stuart


smac,
As said, 12-24 & 24-120VR :wink:
Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
User avatar
birddog114
Senior Member
 
Posts: 15881
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 8:18 pm
Location: Belmore,Sydney

Postby wile_E on Fri Jul 01, 2005 11:24 am

Hi Stuart, I'd have to give my vote for the 24-120 VR as well. Its the lens that is most attached to my camera as it has a very useful focal length, and VR is just awesome (1 sec hand held with minimal (to no) camera/lens shake)!

:D
User avatar
wile_E
Member
 
Posts: 198
Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2004 12:34 pm
Location: Maroubra, Sydney

Postby smac on Fri Jul 01, 2005 11:29 am

Thanks for all of your replies, it is unanimous........a 12-24 and 24-120VR will soon be satisfying my lust........
'Tis better to have loved and lust than never to have lust at all.
User avatar
smac
Member
 
Posts: 342
Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2005 4:15 pm
Location: Baulkham Hills, Sydney

Postby stubbsy on Fri Jul 01, 2005 12:31 pm

smac wrote:Thanks for all of your replies, it is unanimous........a 12-24 and 24-120VR will soon be satisfying my lust........

Stuart

You've made absolutely the right decision. Now all you nned to do is decide on whether the 12-24 is the Sigma or the Nikon. I'd urge the Nikon since that's what I've got, but it costs about 30% more than the Sigma. The SIgma can't take filters on the front and is heavier. The SIgma has less barrell distortion (so I'm told). Of course if I attached Sigma glass to my quality Nikon camer the camera would probably stop working. BTW - I started with 18-70 and 70-300G. My first purchase was 12-24 DX. A while later I got the 24-120 VR and retired the 18-70. Later I robbed a bank and replaced the 70-300 with the 70-200 + 1.7 TC. I then later still got the 50/1.4 prime. I'm pretty happy lens wise now.

Of course now I have SB800 lust and tripod lust to deal with!
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything.
*** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
User avatar
stubbsy
Moderator
 
Posts: 10748
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
Location: Newcastle NSW - D700

Postby HappyFotographer on Fri Jul 01, 2005 1:05 pm

Very Good Phillip :lol:

phillipb wrote:There is only one known cure for lens lust.... Poverty


I can only lust.....and get a bit green with envy...... :twisted:

Deb
"Sometimes when you are sad Poko, it's good to hug the monkey."
User avatar
HappyFotographer
Member
 
Posts: 392
Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2005 4:58 pm
Location: Mnt Riverview Blue Mountains - Nikon D70

Postby robboh on Fri Jul 01, 2005 1:30 pm

There is only one way to cure this (well actually several, but this is the least dangerous).

1. Find a big hammer (how about a DX2?)
2. Hit yourself on the forehead with it. Repeatedly.
3. While exercising step 2, chant the mantra 'I do not want it, I do not need it'

If this fails, the more drastic option is...

1. Print out Birdy's pricelist.
2. Circle all the lenses you just HAVE to have to make you a better photographer, or that you are convinced will help you get the shot that you couldnt have any other way.
3. Subtotal the required expenditure in big red bold numbers at the bottom
4. (OPTIONAL) Consider packing bags for your departure out the door
5. Show the completed form to the significant other...


:twisted:
Smile; it makes people wonder what you have been up to.
User avatar
robboh
Member
 
Posts: 455
Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2005 7:50 pm
Location: Auckland, New Zealand

Postby birddog114 on Fri Jul 01, 2005 1:55 pm

Or use the following simple and no cost treatment which our ancestor did many years ago.

Print out the lens lust list in our bargain section, pray at it then burn it.
Get the ashes from that list, mix with a big glass of red and empty it in one go.
Repeat the above steps few times until the "LUST DISEASE" is cured.

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
User avatar
birddog114
Senior Member
 
Posts: 15881
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 8:18 pm
Location: Belmore,Sydney

Postby robboh on Fri Jul 01, 2005 2:06 pm

Birddog114 wrote:Or use the following simple and no cost treatment which our ancestor did many years ago.

Print out the lens lust list in our bargain section, pray at it then burn it.
Get the ashes from that list, mix with a big glass of red and empty it in one go.
Repeat the above steps few times until the "LUST DISEASE" is cured.

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Sounds similar to a method I tried for giving up smoking. That didnt work either :lol:
Smile; it makes people wonder what you have been up to.
User avatar
robboh
Member
 
Posts: 455
Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2005 7:50 pm
Location: Auckland, New Zealand

Postby mudder on Fri Jul 01, 2005 9:00 pm

This is not a healthy thread for those that suffer from the lust :lol: I'm going to the Otways in a couple of weeks for a waterfall work-shop, and all I can think of now is 12-24DX, 12-24DX, etc..... Sigh...
Aka Andrew
User avatar
mudder
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3020
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 5:58 pm
Location: Melbourne - Burwood East

Postby birddog114 on Fri Jul 01, 2005 9:10 pm

mudder wrote:This is not a healthy thread for those that suffer from the lust :lol: I'm going to the Otways in a couple of weeks for a waterfall work-shop, and all I can think of now is 12-24DX, 12-24DX, etc..... Sigh...


mudder,
I can hear you from here :lol:
Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
User avatar
birddog114
Senior Member
 
Posts: 15881
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 8:18 pm
Location: Belmore,Sydney

Postby mudder on Fri Jul 01, 2005 9:18 pm

Birddog114 wrote:
mudder wrote:This is not a healthy thread for those that suffer from the lust :lol: I'm going to the Otways in a couple of weeks for a waterfall work-shop, and all I can think of now is 12-24DX, 12-24DX, etc..... Sigh...


mudder,
I can hear you from here :lol:


:lol: Ahhhh, the candy man!!! :lol: Oh lens lust lord out there, how do I lust the 12-24DX... (Out of couriosity only I laughingly tell myself), does thou have stock of thy 12-24DX for another lensaholic?? Hic...
Aka Andrew
User avatar
mudder
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3020
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 5:58 pm
Location: Melbourne - Burwood East

Postby birddog114 on Fri Jul 01, 2005 9:24 pm

mudder wrote:
Birddog114 wrote:
mudder wrote:This is not a healthy thread for those that suffer from the lust :lol: I'm going to the Otways in a couple of weeks for a waterfall work-shop, and all I can think of now is 12-24DX, 12-24DX, etc..... Sigh...


mudder,
I can hear you from here :lol:


:lol: Ahhhh, the candy man!!! :lol: Oh lens lust lord out there, how do I lust the 12-24DX... (Out of couriosity only I laughingly tell myself), does thou have stock of thy 12-24DX for another lensaholic?? Hic...


You've got PM.
Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
User avatar
birddog114
Senior Member
 
Posts: 15881
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 8:18 pm
Location: Belmore,Sydney


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques