Out and About in SydneyModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
16 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Out and About in SydneyI recently took a walk around Sydney with D70 in hand. My first public outing with her, so let me know what you think of our work
Last edited by Capturedview on Mon Nov 15, 2004 3:18 pm, edited 1 time in total.
I quite like the first one...
Brilliant compisition.. Good framing of a picture can really punch out an image and turn everyday scenes into artworks! New page
http://www.potofgrass.com Portfolio... http://images.potofgrass.com Comments and money always welcome
Great images. Good teamwork.
The first one is also my favourite, but I woulod crop some out of the left of the image so that the plate glass tower was a lot closer to the edge of the frame. You have a good eye for composition and that is IMHO the toughest challenge. Craig
I like the first one too.
Not crazy about the diagonal approach on the second, subject matter looks good however. cheers Greg - - - - D200 etc
Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius hits a target no one else can see. - Arthur Schopenhauer
I have a problem - I can't view an image and appreciate the art, I always dwell on the technical aspects, such as the first one having moire and what seems to be light fall off in the corners (quite severe too).
A great start !!!
Not sure about Onyx's comment on moire but there certainly appears to be a little vignetting or similar? Can you see that Captured? I'd really appreciate it if when we posted pics we include some technical details... e.g. lens used etc etc... might help identify possible issues and improvements but would also certainly help me learn more !!!
I like number one... not being from sydney it gives an interesting perspective from what you see in postcards etc... well done.
The second one doesn't do it for me... messes too much with my balance... I do like the vibrant colours against the bland greys... but the angle distracts... I agree with MJ... more tech details would be helpful... not a full exif... just simple things like focal length... f-stop... shutter speed... time of day.. lens... cheers http://www.markcrossphotography.com - A camera, glass, and some light.
I like both of them. The dangerous and successful attempt to explore the boundaries of compositional art in the second photo is very nice.
THe first has me following the sharp lines on the wharf and the terninal to the point in the distance where they converge. however a bit of a crop on the left would have removed the extraneous building and made the eyes look even closer to the 'point of infinity.' Well done and a good effort on both. Steve.
|D700| D2H | F5 | 70-200VR | 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-70 | 10.5 | 12-24 | SB800 | Website-> http://www.stevekilburn.com Leeds United for promotion in 2014 - Hurrah!!!
I like the first one...but It's a good idea to try and get something interesting in the foreground. Empty foregrounds usually, (but not always), leave something lacking in an image. If you can go back...take a model...or anything, and take another pic from the same spot. Decide for yourself if it improves the composition.
Keep shooting and keep posting! Regards
Matt. K
I'd like to take a model with me when I go shooting
New page
http://www.potofgrass.com Portfolio... http://images.potofgrass.com Comments and money always welcome
model citizen?
New page
http://www.potofgrass.com Portfolio... http://images.potofgrass.com Comments and money always welcome
Thanks everyone for your comments. I really appreciate the feedback.
Below is a fraction of the EXIF data for both images. Both images were shot with the 18-70 kit lens. Photo 1. ExposureTime - 10/32000 seconds FNumber - 8.00 ExposureProgram - Manual control Flash - Not fired FocalLength - 18.00 mm Maker Note (Vendor): - Photo 2. ExposureTime - 10/1600 seconds FNumber - 8.00 ExposureProgram - Manual control Flash - Not fired FocalLength - 18.00 mm I do notice the light fall off in the corners, apparently an issue with the kit lens? And where abouts is the moire? I didn't notice any myself. Thanks for all the suggestions guys, I really appreciate it. Nick
Hi Nick
I like both shots a lot. The first is looks surreal. I think the absence of any foreground subject adds to this feeling. The almost painting like clouds in the highly urban but deserted environment add to the surreal nature. Love the second shot! The colours are great, and the angle works for me. So, goes to show how subjective art is! Vic
I think I know where the first one was - to the right is the international ferry terminal or some such building, I was there back in June when Mercedes/AMG had a special exhibition on. Flip left and you would be facing the opera house, straight ahead was circular quay?!
Moire - I'm very sensitive to this, normal people probably won't notice it too much... (along with chromatic abberation it's my pet peeve). Note the tall glass building in the visual centre. Now, the shorter building to the right of it. It's noticeable even at this posted small size.
Previous topic • Next topic
16 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|