50mm shots from todayModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
19 posts
• Page 1 of 1
50mm shots from todayAhhh can you tell I'm absolutely obsessing over this lens The quality from the lens absolutely astounds me. I'd hate to see what I'm like when I get the 70-200VR....
Just a few pics taken around and at work. Apologies if the image size is too big.
Although I do not have this lens I can see from your shots that you enjoy using it - the second from last shot really appeals to my senses
Chris
-------------------------------- I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
Is this the 50mm 1.8?
President, A.A.A.A.A (Australian Association Against Acronym Abuse)
Canon EOS R6, RF 24-105 F4, RF 70-200 F4, RF 35mm F1.8, RF 16mm F2.8 "And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." (John 8:32)
Chris, that 2nd last shot was straight from the camera Definitely recommend it esp at Birdy's price.
Max, yup it's the 50 1.8. Learnt a 2 things today: 1) How swell the 50mm 1.8 is 2) Tricks with EV compensation set to - instead of +
Hi Piro, like the 2nd and 4th shot, but send your lens back, on my screen the delete, end and arrow keys are all out of focus
http://wolfeyes.com.au Tactical Torches - Tactical Flashlights Police torch rechargeable torch military torch police military HID surefire flashlight LED torch tactical torch rechargeable wolf eyes flashlight surefire torch wolf eyes tactical torchpolice torch
Thank You
I'm a sucker for signs and repatition (3&4).
The sign is so crsip I love prime lens The gate image(4#) is perfect in my mind. Focus, lighting subject, DoF. Amazing. I'm not even sure if you were trying for artistically correct images or just snapping away. Either way, you got what I like in 4#! --Wade
wow your right so sharp and clear .......great shots
Ben Yu
D300,SB800,Sigma 10-20,Mini Trekker Classic,Nova 3,Ixus 55 Other toys coming very soon..stayed tuned !!!! Check out my site http://byu88.smugmug.com<>http://photobucket.com/byu88
Nice shots. I have to put my own prefs in for the 2nd-last and the no standing sign. Its great having a lens with a nice close min distance and shallow DOF isnt it The 50 1.8 is a great lens!
As far as sharpness v's the 70-200, you might be a little disappointed. Certainly in comparison to my 80-200 2touch, the 50mm is sharper and more contrasty. Will post some comparisons of the 70-200 v's the 50 once my 70-200 and camera arrive back from the repair shop. Smile; it makes people wonder what you have been up to.
Hi everyone,
Thanks for the great comments Wade, the gate photo was a bit of a creative accident I knew the result I wanted from the gate, but I had the wrong WB setting which enhanced it even more. Robboh, I wouldn't mind seeing the comparisons but not as if i'd drop the 70-200VR for a 50 1.8 It's definitely a case of apples and oranges then
Hi Jeff,
All the photos were taken at f1.8 except for the 2nd and 3rd photos which were taken with f4. f1.8 was slightly unpredictable for me as where I thought the spot where it would be in focus turned out to be OOF but a small area above was in focus :S
Nice demonstration of the potential. Has anyone got some 50 1.4 shots for comparison with the D70? Are there any significant differences apart from the obvious 1.4 difference?
In the end we know Nothing, but in the meantime Learn like crazy.
Your Camera Does Matter Nikon D70 D200 D300 PPOK
Previous topic • Next topic
19 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|