Studio images

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Studio images

Postby ozimax on Thu Jul 07, 2005 12:10 am

As mentioned in General discussion forum, here are a few studio images taken of the better half this afternoon, needs PS here and there and a cleaner background etc etc, but any suggestions appreciated from all the portrait pros out there.

F8 @ 1/100 in manual mode using kit lens. I used two lights (no flash) at 45 deg on either side of subject, one with an umbrella and the other without, both at 1/2 power, all wired up to a hot shoe adaptor.

Max

Image

Image

Image

Image
President, A.A.A.A.A (Australian Association Against Acronym Abuse)
Canon EOS R6, RF 24-105 F4, RF 70-200 F4, RF 35mm F1.8, RF 16mm F2.8
"And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." (John 8:32)
User avatar
ozimax
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5289
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2005 11:58 am
Location: Coffs Harbour, NSW

Postby Glen on Thu Jul 07, 2005 1:48 am

Max, huge, huge improvement over the impromptu shots on the beach. Well done :wink:
http://wolfeyes.com.au Tactical Torches - Tactical Flashlights Police torch rechargeable torch military torch police military HID surefire flashlight LED torch tactical torch rechargeable wolf eyes flashlight surefire torch wolf eyes tactical torchpolice torch
Thank You
User avatar
Glen
Moderator
 
Posts: 11819
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 3:14 pm
Location: Sydney - Neutral Bay - Nikon

Postby PiroStitch on Thu Jul 07, 2005 1:55 am

Nice one Max! Overall I think I prefer the lighting in the first image as it's more even. The subsequent images, I'm presuming you moved the lights(?) as there are harsher shadows.

The second image is really nice and warm however maybe a bit more light on the right side (err our right, her left) to remove the shadows a bit.

Keep 'em coming.
User avatar
PiroStitch
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4669
Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2005 1:08 am
Location: Hong Kong

Postby petal666 on Thu Jul 07, 2005 2:30 pm

Why f8? it's keeping the background in focus.
Canon 1D III
User avatar
petal666
Senior Member
 
Posts: 737
Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2004 7:17 am
Location: Toowng QLD - 1D III

Postby Antsl on Thu Jul 07, 2005 3:37 pm

Hi Max,

If you get the chance have another go but this time put both flash units on the one side of the camera and fire them through a reasonably large diffusion material of sorts (lightweight semi translucent sheet), try shooting at f4 or f5.6 (this will help compensate for the lose of flash power through the diffusion material) and move the background back a little more (dont worry about keeping that background flat and in focus either). Keep the diffusion material close to the model (within 1.2 metres and place the flashes about a metre behind the diffuser so that they evenly illuminate it.

The trick with all lighting is to consider what the light looks like from the subjects position... if your model can see a large wall of white light when the flash fires (rather than two smaller light sources as have at the moment then the light will be soft, rather than hard. The softer the light the more flattering it becomes and thats when you will really get nice light and your model will be really impressed!

Keep up the good work!
Ants :)
User avatar
Antsl
Senior Member
 
Posts: 678
Joined: Sun Jun 19, 2005 1:22 am
Location: North Melbourne, Victoria!

Postby ozimax on Thu Jul 07, 2005 5:00 pm

Thanks Ant, will try those suggestions, my light at the moment is definitely way too harsh and highlights every little spot, pimple, pigment etc etc.

What sort of material do you think could be used as a diffuser?

Max
President, A.A.A.A.A (Australian Association Against Acronym Abuse)
Canon EOS R6, RF 24-105 F4, RF 70-200 F4, RF 35mm F1.8, RF 16mm F2.8
"And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." (John 8:32)
User avatar
ozimax
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5289
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2005 11:58 am
Location: Coffs Harbour, NSW

Postby petal666 on Thu Jul 07, 2005 5:05 pm

ozimax wrote:What sort of material do you think could be used as a diffuser?


Did you read through this http://www.ephotozine.com/techniques/viewtechnique.cfm?recid=195 yet?
Canon 1D III
User avatar
petal666
Senior Member
 
Posts: 737
Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2004 7:17 am
Location: Toowng QLD - 1D III

Postby ozimax on Thu Jul 07, 2005 5:05 pm

petal666 wrote:Why f8? it's keeping the background in focus.


Good question, I have no idea except that I believe that F8 is around the sweet spot for many lens.

As Ants has suggested I will try larger aperture with softer light and hopefully shallower depth of field.

Max
President, A.A.A.A.A (Australian Association Against Acronym Abuse)
Canon EOS R6, RF 24-105 F4, RF 70-200 F4, RF 35mm F1.8, RF 16mm F2.8
"And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." (John 8:32)
User avatar
ozimax
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5289
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2005 11:58 am
Location: Coffs Harbour, NSW

Postby ozimax on Thu Jul 07, 2005 5:08 pm

petal666 wrote:
ozimax wrote:What sort of material do you think could be used as a diffuser?


Did you read through this http://www.ephotozine.com/techniques/viewtechnique.cfm?recid=195 yet?


Yes thanks Petal, did look at it, thanks again, Max
President, A.A.A.A.A (Australian Association Against Acronym Abuse)
Canon EOS R6, RF 24-105 F4, RF 70-200 F4, RF 35mm F1.8, RF 16mm F2.8
"And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." (John 8:32)
User avatar
ozimax
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5289
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2005 11:58 am
Location: Coffs Harbour, NSW

Postby avkomp on Thu Jul 07, 2005 9:02 pm

max,
I was reading an article last night on studio lighting and it talked of having a sparkle in the subjects eyes.
Every time we use a flash or a light we can see it in the subjects eye.
When we use 2 lights though we see 2 catch light reflections in the eyes.
Whereas one adds sparkle 2 looks kind of weird and it recommended cloning one out.

you can see in your first 3 shots that 2 lights have been used.
prior to last night, I wouldnt have noticed but now it stands out like dogs you know what.
Steve
User avatar
avkomp
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2485
Joined: Sun May 29, 2005 8:47 pm
Location: Bendoura NSW - Nikon D5

Postby ozimax on Thu Jul 07, 2005 9:23 pm

avkomp wrote:max,
I was reading an article last night on studio lighting and it talked of having a sparkle in the subjects eyes.
Every time we use a flash or a light we can see it in the subjects eye.
When we use 2 lights though we see 2 catch light reflections in the eyes.
Whereas one adds sparkle 2 looks kind of weird and it recommended cloning one out.

you can see in your first 3 shots that 2 lights have been used.
prior to last night, I wouldnt have noticed but now it stands out like dogs you know what.
Steve


Hey Steve, that's amazing, never thought of that, will look into it, thanks heaps, Max
President, A.A.A.A.A (Australian Association Against Acronym Abuse)
Canon EOS R6, RF 24-105 F4, RF 70-200 F4, RF 35mm F1.8, RF 16mm F2.8
"And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." (John 8:32)
User avatar
ozimax
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5289
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2005 11:58 am
Location: Coffs Harbour, NSW

Postby BBJ on Thu Jul 07, 2005 9:59 pm

Hey Max, Good pics mate but i had a lil Play with a pic, hope u dont mind but here it is.
Image
See what you think. Took me a hole few mins so nothing to drastic to get this affect.
Cheers
John
D3,D2x,D70,18-70 kit lens,Sigma 70-200mm F2.8EX HSM,Nikon AF-I 300m F2.8, TC20E 2X
80-400VR,SB800,Vosonic X Drive,VP6210 40
http://www.oz-images.com
User avatar
BBJ
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3651
Joined: Mon Nov 15, 2004 8:49 pm
Location: Mt Gambier South Australia-D70-D2X

Postby ozimax on Thu Jul 07, 2005 11:20 pm

That's heap better John, I posted an image on image reviews a minute ago, mine was way overdone but at least we're getting somewhere here, now if only I can find some semi translucent material and follow Ants idea I may not have to do as much post processing!

Thanks mate,

Max
President, A.A.A.A.A (Australian Association Against Acronym Abuse)
Canon EOS R6, RF 24-105 F4, RF 70-200 F4, RF 35mm F1.8, RF 16mm F2.8
"And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." (John 8:32)
User avatar
ozimax
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5289
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2005 11:58 am
Location: Coffs Harbour, NSW

Postby BBJ on Thu Jul 07, 2005 11:27 pm

Max all i did there was outlined Robs face and neck with the lassoo tool and made the feather 10px , then make a new layer via copy and then Gaussian Blur at around 3.4 and the used them used the erasure tool made the brush a bit bigger and yeh went around her face and eyes to bring up a bit.
But you could spend more time playing with this.
D3,D2x,D70,18-70 kit lens,Sigma 70-200mm F2.8EX HSM,Nikon AF-I 300m F2.8, TC20E 2X
80-400VR,SB800,Vosonic X Drive,VP6210 40
http://www.oz-images.com
User avatar
BBJ
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3651
Joined: Mon Nov 15, 2004 8:49 pm
Location: Mt Gambier South Australia-D70-D2X

Postby yeocsa on Thu Jul 07, 2005 11:37 pm

Lighting for the 3rd is about right. 1st one overexposed. 2nd pic underexposed. Always touch up and remove blemishes etc.. - then you post the pictures. Otherwise your model will not be happy.

example:-
Image

regards,

Arthur
yeocsa
Senior Member
 
Posts: 966
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 12:04 pm
Location: Melbourne

Postby Antsl on Fri Jul 08, 2005 12:46 am

Hi Max...

One of the best diffusion materials to use is a polyester drawing paper that can be purchased off the roll from some professional photocopy centres, in particular the ones that work with large plans for architects and draughtsmen. You may have to shop about for it...

This polyester material looks like a wax paper (or a tracing paper) however it is very tough and durable (you can even wipe it clean as you need to). If I remember correct it is about a metre wide by whatever length you want. Make a frame to support it orjust hang it off something. Place your light about a metre behind it and shoot through it. You will loose about a stop of light through the material but this is actually good.. some other materials will cost you more light. Another advantage with this material is that you can tape it over windows to soften direct sunlight.... it is clever stuff

Hope this is a help!

Cheers, Ants :wink:
User avatar
Antsl
Senior Member
 
Posts: 678
Joined: Sun Jun 19, 2005 1:22 am
Location: North Melbourne, Victoria!

Postby big pix on Fri Jul 08, 2005 12:52 am

This material is very good till it get a bit close to one of your modeling lights and CATCHES FIRE, I had this happen on 2 seperate times and have since used thin perspex, yes a bit heavy but much safer.......

cheers
...bp
Cheers ....bp....
Difference between a good street photographer and a great street photographer....
Removing objects that do not belong...
happy for the comments, but
.....Please DO NOT edit my image.....
http://bigpix.smugmug.com Forever changing
User avatar
big pix
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4513
Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 11:52 pm
Location: Lake Macquarie NSW.

Postby Antsl on Fri Jul 08, 2005 1:19 am

big pix wrote:This material is very good till it get a bit close to one of your modeling lights and CATCHES FIRE, I had this happen on 2 seperate times and have since used thin perspex, yes a bit heavy but much safer.......

cheers
...bp


If you are using the material responsibly you should not have a problem. For the moment I think Max is working with flash and so I doubt there will be much heat from them, particularly at f4. Even then though, my advice to keep one metre between the lights and the material is for more than one reason!

The big advantage of polythene over perspex is that you can roll it up and take it on location or poke it on a corner of a cupboard rather easily, something that you cannot do so easily with perspex. (less chance of getting cut or bumped by it too as you work about it in your studio setup!).
User avatar
Antsl
Senior Member
 
Posts: 678
Joined: Sun Jun 19, 2005 1:22 am
Location: North Melbourne, Victoria!

Postby big pix on Fri Jul 08, 2005 1:37 am

big pix wrote:This material is very good till it get a bit close to one of your modeling lights and CATCHES FIRE, since used thin perspex, yes a bit heavy but much safer.......




Antsl
If you care to re read my post you will find that I did qualify one or two points
I was just pointing out a safty issue if you also use modeling lights also the amount of perspex to be used would not pose a storage issue and if the edges are rounded off you do not get cut. One bit advantage perspex has IT DOES NOT YELLOW WITH AGE AND IS LONG LASTING.

Cheers
...bp
Cheers ....bp....
Difference between a good street photographer and a great street photographer....
Removing objects that do not belong...
happy for the comments, but
.....Please DO NOT edit my image.....
http://bigpix.smugmug.com Forever changing
User avatar
big pix
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4513
Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 11:52 pm
Location: Lake Macquarie NSW.

Postby Antsl on Fri Jul 08, 2005 2:33 am

I'm hunching, BP, that the material I have been happily using for the past five years may be different to your material... it has not turned yellow yet, nor has it gone curly. I haven't tried setting them on fire though!

Having been very happy with the material I have been using I actually rang the company I bought it off in NZ to accurately determine what I am using... at the time that I bought my stuff they informed me it was a polycarbonate film.. this may not be the case though, the last time I talked to them they reckoned it was polyester.

My advice is to experiment and test them. I have used perspex in the studio too and I have also seen it melt in front of lights. Use common sense, use the right materials for the right applications.
User avatar
Antsl
Senior Member
 
Posts: 678
Joined: Sun Jun 19, 2005 1:22 am
Location: North Melbourne, Victoria!

Postby genji on Fri Jul 08, 2005 10:50 am

Antsl wrote:Hi Max...

a polyester drawing paper that can be purchased off the roll from some professional photocopy centres, in particular the ones that work with large plans for architects and draughtsmen


its called 'double matte film'...
User avatar
genji
Senior Member
 
Posts: 570
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 12:08 pm
Location: Carlton ------->D[enter number here]<-------

Postby KerryPierce on Fri Jul 08, 2005 3:19 pm

I can't give any tips on studio stuff, but I like the 3rd and 4th shots a great deal. The 4th one seems off a little on the skin tones, but it's a great shot that shows her personality.

I can see why she's your better half, maybe better 3/4. :D :lol:
my gallery of so-so photos
http://www.pbase.com/kerrypierce/
User avatar
KerryPierce
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1233
Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2005 5:20 pm
Location: Detroit, MI

Postby ozimax on Fri Jul 08, 2005 4:47 pm

You're dead right Kerrie, I have a head tailor made for radio, why, I even scare myself looking into the mirror when powdering my bald head first thing in the morning (to keep the models from glare-burn in a photo shoot). 8) Robyn is an absolute stunner, yes, even at 41 years of age.

Thanks Ants and others, will look out for some of that meterial and give it a whirl.

Max
President, A.A.A.A.A (Australian Association Against Acronym Abuse)
Canon EOS R6, RF 24-105 F4, RF 70-200 F4, RF 35mm F1.8, RF 16mm F2.8
"And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." (John 8:32)
User avatar
ozimax
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5289
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2005 11:58 am
Location: Coffs Harbour, NSW


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques