Sydney Botanical Gardens todayModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
13 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Sydney Botanical Gardens todayA few shots from a walk around the gardens today - great day for a stroll and shoot, although very bright for photo taking. Comments appreciated.
Great!
The one critisism I would make is I find the first one a bit "busy" I love the unfolding ferns! New page
http://www.potofgrass.com Portfolio... http://images.potofgrass.com Comments and money always welcome
Thanks all for comments. I was just using the kit lens, hand held, but wide open as no tripod so being hand held. Seems I tend to like taking close ups a bit, so maybe looking around for a lens suitable for more macro work. Have been impressed with some previous posts using the Sigma 105 macro.
Thanks MHD - I agree that photo1 looks a bit busy - I thought the same at the time of pp, but liked it despite this so pushed on. Vic
I agree with Ajo. The forst pic as a cacophany of light, colours and shapes that blend well together. It looks like a Christmas tree decoration.
Well done. Steve.
|D700| D2H | F5 | 70-200VR | 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-70 | 10.5 | 12-24 | SB800 | Website-> http://www.stevekilburn.com Leeds United for promotion in 2014 - Hurrah!!!
I also agree with Jonesy and Killa. No 1 is good.
No-one has mentioned bokeh. Is it bokeh? I thought it was bokeh. If it is bokeh, is it good bokeh? Have I mentioned bokeh more times in one post than ever before bokeh? Greg - - - - D200 etc
Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius hits a target no one else can see. - Arthur Schopenhauer
Just to be a bit controversial, I like no. 1 best.
That is some sweeet bokeh. And I'm selling my kit lens too... bugger. Cheers Dean I intend to live forever. So far, so good.
D2x | Nikkor 24-120vr & 50/1.8 | Sigma 12-24 & 24-70/2.8 & 70-200/2.8 | SB800 | Velbon 640CF Tripod w/ Markins M10 & RRS plates. And then there's my Bag Collection... Sweeet....;-)
Actually that first flower does look a little busy. Busy having a good time at the Mardi Gras in downtown New Orleans.
Cheers Dean I intend to live forever. So far, so good.
D2x | Nikkor 24-120vr & 50/1.8 | Sigma 12-24 & 24-70/2.8 & 70-200/2.8 | SB800 | Velbon 640CF Tripod w/ Markins M10 & RRS plates. And then there's my Bag Collection... Sweeet....;-)
the first photoI also like the fist photo.
I think it is very much alive. (nice bokeh too) Cheers CTD
Previous topic • Next topic
13 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|