Angled shot - tranquil industrial.Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
9 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Angled shot - tranquil industrial.I dont know if this can be classified as being creative or not but i quite liked this shot on the angle. Not one for the photography purists i guess.
[img]http://www.fototime.com/{453FB0F2-9C6A-4F71-97A3-5C06A95325A2}/picture.JPG[/img]
I like it and don't like it at the same time.
What I like are the colours and the reflection, however I dont' like the angle as the tilt for me isn't exaggerated enough. I would have preferred the angle to be at least 20 degrees. The shallow angle gives too much ground for the horizon police to come in and slap you with a ticket Hassy, Leica, Nikon, iPhone
Come follow the rabbit hole...
Understand what you were going for, but I think it would have looked better if on the level with slightly more blue foreground and slightly more saturation...
Also - this maybe me, but I find that your method of putting your copyright and Exif data underneath detracts from the photo... Cheers, John
Leek@Flickr | Leek@RedBubble | Leek@DeviantArt D700; D200; Tokina 12-24; Nikkor 50mm f1.4,18-70mm,85mm f1.8, 105mm,80-400VR, SB-800s; G1227LVL; RRS BH-55; Feisol 1401
I agree with Leekie
Your name and EXIF much too loud. Keep it subtle. Love the image concept. The tilt needs a reason....something in the foreground maybe, but nice and sharp and the colours pop. Regards
Matt. K
Matt and Leek - thanks for that tip on my script - i will take it on board. Im interested to know - how do you guys copyright your images?
Personally I don't bother (YET)... I include my copyright as a comment in the EXIF, but apart from that, don't really bother... At the moment, I'd probably treat it as a compliment if someone ripped off one of my images... If I ever become famous, I'd probably reduce the resolution of web-images so that they are useless for printing and / or include a subtle copyright watermark... Amongst others, the watermark used by Kerry Pierce is a good example of what I mean... Any watermark needs to be positioned so that it can't be easily cropped out and doesn't detract too much from the image. Cheers, John
Leek@Flickr | Leek@RedBubble | Leek@DeviantArt D700; D200; Tokina 12-24; Nikkor 50mm f1.4,18-70mm,85mm f1.8, 105mm,80-400VR, SB-800s; G1227LVL; RRS BH-55; Feisol 1401
Do you prefer this script guys?
[img]http://www.fototime.com/{89EC9552-A4B5-4AB4-BFF8-4F2D20A21F9E}/picture.JPG[/img]
Previous topic • Next topic
9 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|