A couple of Still lifeModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
12 posts
• Page 1 of 1
A couple of Still lifeHi guys,
I've been trying my hand at some more still lifes and would appreciate any comments and critique. Crushed Tulip An old favourite Edit: Sunset pic removed because it doesnt fit. Cheers Last edited by rokkstar on Wed Jul 13, 2005 9:19 am, edited 1 time in total.
Matt
Thanks guys.
Robboh, the lighting was a simple table lamp angled to get the shadow. Taken with the kit lens, f/4.5, 1/80. Very simple set up because that's all I have to play with at the moment. Matt
Matt
The first one is superb. The second one is interesting - hadn't seen it done before - or else I'm a goldfish Although I keep trying to read the book. THird - OOF on the whisk is a shame, but the egg is nice and sharp (or should I say smooth ) Sunset - not sure why, but I don't like it. Probably it's the very busy top which I'd like to see cropped out a little and maybe the image could be a little darker. Three out of four ain't bad Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything. *** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
Cheers Peter,
I don't know why I put the sunset in with these. It just doesn't fit at all. In fact I'm going to remove it. The book one I'm sure I have seen before, it's by no means original, just wanted to experiment with the light and shadow. The book is "The rule of four". Thanks for the comments mate. Matt
The book is "The Rule of Four" by Ian Caldwell & Dustin Thomason.
It is open at Page 200. Good photograph! TFF (Trevor)
My History Blog: Your Brisbane: Past & Present My Photo Blog: The Foto Fanatic Nikon stuff!
Would you believe that this is the book I am reading at the moment! I recognised the word in italics in your image- "Hypnerotomachia", which is virtually the main theme in the book. And I do think it is a good pic. TFF (Trevor)
My History Blog: Your Brisbane: Past & Present My Photo Blog: The Foto Fanatic Nikon stuff!
How do you guys find time to read books
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything. *** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
Previous topic • Next topic
12 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|