IR?Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
6 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Oooh... I thought you were going to start complaining about Industrial Relations again there for a minute (IR Geddit!!!)
Is that really an Infra-Red shot Gerard??? It doesn't seem to have that pronounced white-leaf look of the IR shots I've seen so far and doesn't look that different to a B&W shot... Locks / canals - must be somewhere on your recent European trip... Cheers, John
Leek@Flickr | Leek@RedBubble | Leek@DeviantArt D700; D200; Tokina 12-24; Nikkor 50mm f1.4,18-70mm,85mm f1.8, 105mm,80-400VR, SB-800s; G1227LVL; RRS BH-55; Feisol 1401
I have a few tips after my recent IR experimentation
1. IR works best when direct sunlight shines directly onto the trees 2. Clouds and atmospheric effects like smog and fog are enhanced when using IR, but trees and grass don't have as much contrast. 3. White balance has got a lot to do with how much contrast you will get, i find if the white balance is set to 9000K+ you get a high contrast image
I have a 52mm Hoya RM72 IR filter it's like AU$40 from ebay I thought you used the real thing, very tricky no wonder the image looks abit flat, try the filter on a very high contrast image of a sunlit scene with clouds in it, see how photoshop renders IR on that.
Previous topic • Next topic
6 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|