The moon thru the clouds (2 img)Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
11 posts
• Page 1 of 1
The moon thru the clouds (2 img)Went outside to throw the rubbish out and noticed a hole in the clouds where the moon was peeking through......so of course I bolted inside to grab camera & tripod.
Here are 2 of the better ones: Thought I'd share Comments/thoughts welcomed... Dave
Nikon D7000 | 18-105 VR Lens | Nikon 50 1.8G | Sigma 70-300 APO II Super Macro | Tokina 11-16 AT-X | Nikon SB-800 | Lowepro Mini Trekker AWII Photography = Compromise
Dave
Nice pics - prefer the first - more clouds apparent so more atmospheric PS> Are you married? If so, why are you puttin out the garbage? ... ducks behind monitor Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything. *** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
thanks guys.
Stubbsy - I am married, which is why "I" was taking out the garbage Bloop - unfortunately, I was shooting through a layer of clouds so the moon isn't very detailed when highly cropped (which is what I need to do with only a 300mm lens). It was also cold down here in Melbourne, but I figure you have to take these opportunities when they arise. I thought about just going back inside where it was warm, but the little voice inside my head kept saying "you'll be thinking about the shot for the rest of the night, wishing you had taken it".....so I did. Crazy ? YES. But who of us here aren't crazy when it comes to our beloved camera ?!?!? Dave
Nikon D7000 | 18-105 VR Lens | Nikon 50 1.8G | Sigma 70-300 APO II Super Macro | Tokina 11-16 AT-X | Nikon SB-800 | Lowepro Mini Trekker AWII Photography = Compromise
I took a shot with the same lens a couple of days ago and yes you do get to see craters fairly well. I'll have to play some more with apertures though as my shot duration is too short really - which is giving me grain problems. http://www.pixspot.com/albums/userpics/normal_DSC_0099web.jpg
Hi Dave, love the look of the moon through the clouds!
You prompted me to test out the Sigma@270mm, hoping to see some difference although it didn't look too disimilar to the shot I took with my Nikon 70-210mm awhile back. (Smartsharpened + USM)-Sigma 70-300mm@270 1/400@f/8 ISO400. Paul, what were your settings used for your shot? It looks quite detailed! Last edited by waspo on Wed Jul 20, 2005 11:08 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Jase - 'Motorcycle Gallery' - 'Car Gallery'
G'day Dave,
Cool moon shot, really like the atmosphere the clouds add... Might be worth a try with some added contrast on the moon itself? Prefer the first shot, more moody... Jase, good shot mate... Clear and detailed... Aka Andrew
F5.6 @ 1/100sec - 300mm. I'm still playing with the camera and trying to work out what works - I've only had a digital camera for 1 month so it's all new. I tried a few moon shots tonight but getting shakes on my tripod. Unfortunately the tripod's a fairly cheap video tripod so shorter than 1/50sec is fine - anything longer is just a blur.
Thanks paul. I thought maybe you had it a little faster. I shot mine 1/400@f/8 ISO400. My tripod wobbles around abit too and I have to wait til it settles to trigger the remote.
Update: Just tried 1/40@f/32-too soft. Looks like the principle regarding focal length and speed still applies that being focal length at 300mm should equate to shutter speed 1/300 or more there abouts. Oh well, having fun learning. Cheers, Jase. Jase - 'Motorcycle Gallery' - 'Car Gallery'
Previous topic • Next topic
11 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|