Few shots with my new lenses

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Few shots with my new lenses

Postby mitedo on Fri Jul 29, 2005 8:31 am

Thanks to Birddog i now have 2 new lens :D :D 200mmf4 Macro - 10.5mm Fisheye, heres a few first shots cant waite to get into the macro`s today :D
Kev

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

these two taken with the 200mm

Image

Image
User avatar
mitedo
Member
 
Posts: 465
Joined: Sat Jun 18, 2005 11:02 pm
Location: Noosaville .

Postby Heath Bennett on Fri Jul 29, 2005 8:45 am

Very nice Kev. You have re-ignited my lust for both objects :roll:
HB
User avatar
Heath Bennett
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1351
Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2005 8:49 pm
Location: Morisset/Bonnells Bay

Postby birddog114 on Fri Jul 29, 2005 8:46 am

Heath Bennett wrote:Very nice Kev. You have re-ignited my lust for both objects :roll:


HB,
How far? :lol:
Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
User avatar
birddog114
Senior Member
 
Posts: 15881
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 8:18 pm
Location: Belmore,Sydney

Postby mitedo on Fri Jul 29, 2005 8:57 am

Hi Heath ive only taken a few shots so far,i think there`s a lot more to come, the 200macro is fantastic lens
kev
User avatar
mitedo
Member
 
Posts: 465
Joined: Sat Jun 18, 2005 11:02 pm
Location: Noosaville .

Postby radar on Fri Jul 29, 2005 9:00 am

Beautiful shots Kev,

My favourite is the first one close second is the last one, classic on the river with the rowers.

They certainly are crystal clear, looking forward to seeing your coming photos with the 200mm

Well done,

Radar
Photography, as a powerful medium of expression and communications, offers an infinite variety of perception, interpretation and execution. Ansel Adams

(misc Nikon stuff)
User avatar
radar
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2823
Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2005 11:18 am
Location: Lake Macquarie (Newcastle) - D700, D7000

Postby birddog114 on Fri Jul 29, 2005 9:06 am

mitedo wrote:Hi Heath ive only taken a few shots so far,i think there`s a lot more to come, the 200macro is fantastic lens
kev


mitedo,
The 200/f4 is the one was built with "full metal jacket", quality of sharpness, clarity, and has its ability of a small long lens also.

You can see how heavy it's in comparison with the 10.5 FE or the new 300 AF-S/ F4.

Pls. note: Nikon doesn't produce these type of built/ construction in their Nikkor range anymore. Perhaps one day near, you'll find it rare items.

This is another reason, why I want to keep and lust the "old fashion" built Nikkor lens. The new Nikkor type/ range, it seems to me plasticky and the rings (apeture/ focus) play up a lot after few month in use.
Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
User avatar
birddog114
Senior Member
 
Posts: 15881
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 8:18 pm
Location: Belmore,Sydney

Postby mitedo on Fri Jul 29, 2005 9:08 am

Thanks the river shots were taken at around half 5 today, i forgot the tripod so the shots were handheld i think they have come out ok, at 100% crop you can see a tad of motion blur
Kevin
User avatar
mitedo
Member
 
Posts: 465
Joined: Sat Jun 18, 2005 11:02 pm
Location: Noosaville .

Postby Oneputt on Fri Jul 29, 2005 9:39 am

Nice ones, and they are only going to get better :D

I reckon that between us we have just about got the whole range covered :wink:
"The good thing about meditation is that it makes doing nothing respectable"

D3 - http://www.oneputtphotographics.com
User avatar
Oneputt
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3174
Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2005 3:58 pm
Location: Stuck in traffic Maroochydore.

Postby birddog114 on Fri Jul 29, 2005 9:40 am

Oneputt wrote:Nice ones, and they are only going to get better :D

I reckon that between us we have just about got the whole range covered :wink:


Oneputt,
You're lucky to have mitedo within few strokes.
Have fun!
Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
User avatar
birddog114
Senior Member
 
Posts: 15881
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 8:18 pm
Location: Belmore,Sydney

Postby mitedo on Fri Jul 29, 2005 9:47 am

John all we need to get is the 200mmf2 VR & 200-400mm VR :wink:
User avatar
mitedo
Member
 
Posts: 465
Joined: Sat Jun 18, 2005 11:02 pm
Location: Noosaville .

Postby birddog114 on Fri Jul 29, 2005 9:52 am

mitedo wrote:John all we need to get is the 200mmf2 VR & 200-400mm VR :wink:


mitedo,
Don't go with the 200 VR, I found it's not useful range though oneputt already have the 70-200VR and you have the 200/f4.
Honestly, I want the 300/VR previously but had changed my mind due to the 200-400VR in my possession + 3 x TCs of 1.4/1.7/2.0, now I'm looking forward to see my 500/ AF-S II.
Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
User avatar
birddog114
Senior Member
 
Posts: 15881
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 8:18 pm
Location: Belmore,Sydney

Postby mitedo on Fri Jul 29, 2005 10:07 am

The 500 sounds good , i see there is a 600mm nikon lens on ebay i think its around 6-7gs
User avatar
mitedo
Member
 
Posts: 465
Joined: Sat Jun 18, 2005 11:02 pm
Location: Noosaville .

Postby birddog114 on Fri Jul 29, 2005 10:08 am

mitedo wrote:The 500 sounds good , i see there is a 600mm nikon lens on ebay i think its around 6-7gs


Not much interest in the 600mm range though. :wink:
Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
User avatar
birddog114
Senior Member
 
Posts: 15881
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 8:18 pm
Location: Belmore,Sydney

Postby Oneputt on Fri Jul 29, 2005 10:37 am

Even luckier Birddog now he is a Nikon man :wink:
"The good thing about meditation is that it makes doing nothing respectable"

D3 - http://www.oneputtphotographics.com
User avatar
Oneputt
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3174
Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2005 3:58 pm
Location: Stuck in traffic Maroochydore.

Postby birddog114 on Fri Jul 29, 2005 10:52 am

Oneputt wrote:Even luckier Birddog now he is a Nikon man :wink:


Yes, he's and with severed infection of lust :wink:
Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
User avatar
birddog114
Senior Member
 
Posts: 15881
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 8:18 pm
Location: Belmore,Sydney


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques