Mystery Lady - Mk II

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Mystery Lady - Mk II

Postby stubbsy on Mon Jul 25, 2005 6:39 pm

Well after a number of comments about the busy background in the first of my shots of the mystery lady in THIS POST I've reworked it using the burn tool in PS (and a touch of cloning) to dull down the background. Does this work better for you, or have I wasted my time :wink: ?

Click the image for a larger version
Image
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything.
*** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
User avatar
stubbsy
Moderator
 
Posts: 10748
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
Location: Newcastle NSW - D700

Postby Glen on Mon Jul 25, 2005 6:59 pm

It works for me full size but next time I think I would just ask her to stand up and hope she still gives you the same look :wink:
http://wolfeyes.com.au Tactical Torches - Tactical Flashlights Police torch rechargeable torch military torch police military HID surefire flashlight LED torch tactical torch rechargeable wolf eyes flashlight surefire torch wolf eyes tactical torchpolice torch
Thank You
User avatar
Glen
Moderator
 
Posts: 11819
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 3:14 pm
Location: Sydney - Neutral Bay - Nikon

Postby wendellt on Mon Jul 25, 2005 7:15 pm

Much better
It's never a waste of time if you learn something
User avatar
wendellt
Outstanding Member of the year (Don't try this at home.)
 
Posts: 4078
Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2005 10:04 am
Location: Dilettante Outside the City Walls, Sydney

Postby big pix on Mon Jul 25, 2005 8:23 pm

....... this pix now has my attention, nice work.....
Cheers ....bp....
Difference between a good street photographer and a great street photographer....
Removing objects that do not belong...
happy for the comments, but
.....Please DO NOT edit my image.....
http://bigpix.smugmug.com Forever changing
User avatar
big pix
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4513
Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 11:52 pm
Location: Lake Macquarie NSW.

Postby stubbsy on Tue Jul 26, 2005 9:02 pm

Thank you one and all for the help in getting this right. I didn't notice the busy background until someone mentioned it and there's no question this is now a much better image.
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything.
*** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
User avatar
stubbsy
Moderator
 
Posts: 10748
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
Location: Newcastle NSW - D700

Postby Killakoala on Wed Jul 27, 2005 11:30 pm

Peter, rather than use the burn tool for what you did, which i think is not the right tool for the job, perhaps you could have cut her out of the image, darken it using brightness or someting or other and then put her back in it. It would look heaps better as there is some areas close to her head that is not properly burned-in.

The desired effect looks good.

My two cents.
:)
Steve.
|D700| D2H | F5 | 70-200VR | 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-70 | 10.5 | 12-24 | SB800 |
Website-> http://www.stevekilburn.com
Leeds United for promotion in 2014 - Hurrah!!!
User avatar
Killakoala
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5398
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 3:31 pm
Location: Southland NZ

Postby Matt. K on Wed Jul 27, 2005 11:50 pm

Peter
The image has a lot of impact. Next time try and pose your model "undraped". :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Regards

Matt. K
User avatar
Matt. K
Former Outstanding Member Of The Year and KM
 
Posts: 9981
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2004 7:12 pm
Location: North Nowra

Postby stubbsy on Thu Jul 28, 2005 11:33 am

Killakoala wrote:Peter, rather than use the burn tool for what you did, which i think is not the right tool for the job, perhaps you could have cut her out of the image, darken it using brightness or someting or other and then put her back in it. It would look heaps better as there is some areas close to her head that is not properly burned-in.

The desired effect looks good.

My two cents.
:)

Steve

I actually thought about it, but have never been able to successfully cut a piece out of an image for this purpose. Either I'm impatient or my technique is lacking. I always seem to end up with sharp edges where I cut so the effect gets ruined since you can see where I did it.
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything.
*** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
User avatar
stubbsy
Moderator
 
Posts: 10748
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
Location: Newcastle NSW - D700

Postby MattC on Thu Jul 28, 2005 11:48 am

Looking good. I would have used a layer and mask. Like Stubbsy, my technique and/or patience is lacking for effectively cutting things out of an image. I find areas where background is visible through hair especially difficult.

Cheers

Matt
MattC
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1061
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2004 6:59 pm
Location: Pilbara WA

Postby Andoru on Thu Jul 28, 2005 1:55 pm

The PS work is rather obvious I'm afraid Stubbsy. Theoretically speaking, having a blurred background due to a shallow DOF is ideal, though in this case the PS "fix" doesn't work that well in my opinion. I rather prefer the original.
User avatar
Andoru
Member
 
Posts: 195
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2005 3:10 am
Location: Sydney

Postby mic on Thu Jul 28, 2005 2:44 pm

Stubbsy,

I saw that lady in the Eyes Wide Shut Movie :shock:

Nice, very nice.

Mic :wink:
User avatar
mic
Retired Egg Flipper
 
Posts: 2167
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2004 2:33 pm
Location: Glen Waverly VIC

Postby John H. on Fri Jul 29, 2005 12:10 pm

Image

I hope you don't mind Stubbsy, but I had a go at PP your Mystery Lady.
The hair is a real problem but this is a 15min attempt and more time would produce better results.

If you disapprove let me know and I'll delete it.
Cheers
John H.
User avatar
John H.
Newbie
 
Posts: 40
Joined: Tue Jul 19, 2005 10:52 pm
Location: Newcastle

Postby sirhc55 on Fri Jul 29, 2005 12:14 pm

I love this pic Peter - my only suggestion concerns her right eye (looking at the pic) - I would love to clone this and move it to a more suitable location as everytime I look at the pic I am drawn to this eye. 8)
Chris
--------------------------------
I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
User avatar
sirhc55
Key Member
 
Posts: 12930
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 6:57 pm
Location: Port Macquarie - Olympus EM-10

Postby stubbsy on Fri Jul 29, 2005 1:58 pm

John H. wrote:I hope you don't mind Stubbsy, but I had a go at PP your Mystery Lady.
The hair is a real problem but this is a 15min attempt and more time would produce better results.

If you disapprove let me know and I'll delete it.

John. No problems. Personally I think the coolness of the grey contrasts too strongly with the warmth of the colour - probably needs to be darker. The hair is the problem I have in separating the foreground and background elements for more clever PP.
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything.
*** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
User avatar
stubbsy
Moderator
 
Posts: 10748
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
Location: Newcastle NSW - D700

Postby stubbsy on Fri Jul 29, 2005 2:01 pm

sirhc55 wrote:I love this pic Peter - my only suggestion concerns her right eye (looking at the pic) - I would love to clone this and move it to a more suitable location as everytime I look at the pic I am drawn to this eye. 8)

My problem exactly. The shot has a really nice vibe to it, yet she looks crosseyed. Normally I'd just move on, but there's something that makes me want to get this one to work since it's 99.9999% there :wink:

Couldn't get the eye to look any better, but redid the background using a layer mask. This is my final attempt!

Image
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything.
*** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
User avatar
stubbsy
Moderator
 
Posts: 10748
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
Location: Newcastle NSW - D700

Postby MattC on Fri Jul 29, 2005 8:29 pm

Stubbsy,

I think that you may be going a little too far with the background. Instead of trying to obliterate it :D, perhaps a more subtle approach. Darken it a little, blur it some and maybe desaturate it some, to seperate it from the subject. I think the colours and style of the background can work well with the subject. There is just a need for some seperation.

You are right, this shot has something that appeals. Perhaps its the cross eyed look or maybe it is the combination of colour and highlights - I think maybe the later.

I had a bit of a go. What I did was to start by duplicating the layer and creating the layer mask. I then duplicated this layer and mask so that the original is left alone - this allows room to play without going through the tedium of recreating the mask. I used a brush with a hardness of around 40%. Next, gaussian blur was applied to this layer. Enough so that the blur was right at about 50% layer opacity. 50% was an arbitrary value that I used so that the foreground and background layers would blend reasonbly well and give room for adjustment. Next, still working in this same layer, I played with brightness, contrast and saturation to taste - yours may differ. I thought about brightening her eyes a little but did not get that far.

Cheers

Matt

Image
MattC
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1061
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2004 6:59 pm
Location: Pilbara WA

Postby stubbsy on Fri Jul 29, 2005 11:57 pm

MattC wrote:Stubbsy,

I think that you may be going a little too far with the background. Instead of trying to obliterate it :D, perhaps a more subtle approach. Darken it a little, blur it some and maybe desaturate it some, to seperate it from the subject. I think the colours and style of the background can work well with the subject. There is just a need for some seperation.

You are right, this shot has something that appeals. Perhaps its the cross eyed look or maybe it is the combination of colour and highlights - I think maybe the later.

I had a bit of a go. What I did was to start by duplicating the layer and creating the layer mask. I then duplicated this layer and mask so that the original is left alone - this allows room to play without going through the tedium of recreating the mask. I used a brush with a hardness of around 40%. Next, gaussian blur was applied to this layer. Enough so that the blur was right at about 50% layer opacity. 50% was an arbitrary value that I used so that the foreground and background layers would blend reasonbly well and give room for adjustment. Next, still working in this same layer, I played with brightness, contrast and saturation to taste - yours may differ. I thought about brightening her eyes a little but did not get that far.

Cheers

Matt]

OK

One last go. Both the newer version below and the most recent "last" one were done basically the same as you described Matt. I went back to the PSD file I'd had the foresight to save and adjusted the background layer a little - this REALLY is my last attempt :wink:

Image
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything.
*** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
User avatar
stubbsy
Moderator
 
Posts: 10748
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
Location: Newcastle NSW - D700

Postby leek on Sun Jul 31, 2005 8:33 am

Hi Peter,
I haven't commented so far, because I wasn't sure what effect you were trying for...
I think that the effect of the picture is spoilt somewhat by the fact that the mask is a little too large for her face. As you said earlier - it make her look cock-eyed.
Maybe it would have looked better from another angle so that her eyes weren't hidden by the mask...
Cheers, John
Leek@Flickr | Leek@RedBubble | Leek@DeviantArt

D700; D200; Tokina 12-24; Nikkor 50mm f1.4,18-70mm,85mm f1.8, 105mm,80-400VR, SB-800s; G1227LVL; RRS BH-55; Feisol 1401
User avatar
leek
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3135
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 4:46 pm
Location: Lane Cove, Sydney


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques