Contemplation

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Contemplation

Postby johndec on Sun Jul 31, 2005 11:45 pm

Can't really decide if belongs in the "neat and in the middle" school or the "rule of thirds" school :lol:

Hell, can't even decide if I like it....

Image
If I'm alone in a forest and my wife is not around to hear what I say, am I still wrong ??
User avatar
johndec
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1327
Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2004 11:24 pm
Location: Sans Souci, Sydney...D200....

Postby sirhc55 on Mon Aug 01, 2005 12:52 am

I don’t mind the young lady being in the middle at all. I am not a strict advocate of the thirds rule and my only critique would have been to try and make all of the background water :D
Chris
--------------------------------
I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
User avatar
sirhc55
Key Member
 
Posts: 12930
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 6:57 pm
Location: Port Macquarie - Olympus EM-10

Postby avkomp on Mon Aug 01, 2005 1:20 am

In my opinion the rule of thirds doesnt always apply, the final composition being at the sole discretion of the photographer in order to convey the message.

the main issue with this shot for me though is that the subject should be fully water, the 2 inches or so at the top of the head not in water weakens the shot.

Steve
User avatar
avkomp
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2485
Joined: Sun May 29, 2005 8:47 pm
Location: Bendoura NSW - Nikon D5

Postby WadeM on Mon Aug 01, 2005 8:01 pm

I also find the sand distracting.

The 3rds rule on this shot, would show a stronger disassociation, or refelection I think. Central object tend to have no direction (they are central), where as placing it in a 3rd allows it to move through the frame. I like both schools, this shot is a 3rd school for me.

It's a VERY sharp shot regardless!

Cheers,
--Wade
WadeM
Member
 
Posts: 135
Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2005 10:36 pm
Location: .syd.au.

Postby avkomp on Mon Aug 01, 2005 8:31 pm

actually, if her head was wholly backgrounded by water, then the line of the sand would give you just about your rule of thirds
Steve
User avatar
avkomp
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2485
Joined: Sun May 29, 2005 8:47 pm
Location: Bendoura NSW - Nikon D5

Postby nito on Mon Aug 01, 2005 10:02 pm

can someone please explain to me the third's rule. 1/3 subject, 1/3 foreground, 1/3 background???? Or does it refer to whether she needs to be framed 1/3 to the side???

Thanks
nito
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1109
Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 11:24 am
Location: Gladesville, NSW

Postby avkomp on Mon Aug 01, 2005 10:18 pm

there has been plenty written about the rule of thirds and that it neednt be rigidly adhered to

because I am lazy, I googled "rule of thirds" and got heaps of hits
http://www.palmettobayinc.com/PhotoTutorials/thirds.html
was about the first I got explaining basic concepts

regards Steve
User avatar
avkomp
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2485
Joined: Sun May 29, 2005 8:47 pm
Location: Bendoura NSW - Nikon D5

Postby nito on Tue Aug 02, 2005 8:57 pm

Thanks avkomp :)
nito
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1109
Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 11:24 am
Location: Gladesville, NSW

Postby ozimax on Tue Aug 02, 2005 9:05 pm

nito wrote:can someone please explain to me the third's rule. 1/3 subject, 1/3 foreground, 1/3 background???? Or does it refer to whether she needs to be framed 1/3 to the side???

Thanks


1/3 D70 1/3 Nikon lens 1/3 Italian coffee
:shock: :D :)

Max
President, A.A.A.A.A (Australian Association Against Acronym Abuse)
Canon EOS R6, RF 24-105 F4, RF 70-200 F4, RF 35mm F1.8, RF 16mm F2.8
"And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." (John 8:32)
User avatar
ozimax
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5289
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2005 11:58 am
Location: Coffs Harbour, NSW


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques