What is your preference for photo resolution?

Have your say on issues related to using a DSLR camera.

Moderator: Moderators

Forum rules
Please ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

What's your preference for photo resolution?

640x480
3
13%
800x600
9
38%
1024x768
4
17%
1280x768 (widescreen)
1
4%
1280x1024
3
13%
1600x1200 (and beyond)
4
17%
 
Total votes : 24

What is your preference for photo resolution?

Postby informer on Thu Aug 04, 2005 12:44 pm

Just doing a poll because I have a widescreen notebook with a resolution of 1680x1050 (max. of 2048x1536). Although I prefer viewing pictures at this resolution, I know not everybody elses' computers are the same.

If our resolution varies so much, then what should be the standard resolution for photos?
Check out my latest - http://englishnewbies.tripod.com/blog
--------------------------------------------------
Team D50 - Honcho leader [ Japan ]
--------------------------------------------------
"Don't bother with PotW" - John Howard
User avatar
informer
Member
 
Posts: 156
Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2005 10:00 pm
Location: Tokyo, Japan

Postby genji on Thu Aug 04, 2005 12:52 pm

You can always provide a link to the larger image, if its nescessary.
User avatar
genji
Senior Member
 
Posts: 570
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 12:08 pm
Location: Carlton ------->D[enter number here]<-------

Re: What is your preference for photo resolution?

Postby Aussie Dave on Thu Aug 04, 2005 1:12 pm

sorry Informer, I'm not quite following you.

Do you mean what resolution do we have our monitors set to, or what resolution do we set our photos up for (to post on the forum) ??

For me,
monitor = 1280 x 1024 (19" CRT Monitor)
photos - roughly 800-900px along longest side

(I believe the forum prefers images about 800px along longest side). Sometimes with frames, mine are a little longer :twisted:
Dave
Nikon D7000 | 18-105 VR Lens | Nikon 50 1.8G | Sigma 70-300 APO II Super Macro | Tokina 11-16 AT-X | Nikon SB-800 | Lowepro Mini Trekker AWII
Photography = Compromise
User avatar
Aussie Dave
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1427
Joined: Sun Nov 21, 2004 1:40 pm
Location: West. Suburbs, Melbourne [Nikon D7000]

Postby sheepie on Thu Aug 04, 2005 1:38 pm

should be no wider than 800 for the forum, but any size (preferably a selection) on an external link :)
*** When getting there is half the fun! ***
User avatar
sheepie
Key Member
 
Posts: 3029
Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2004 11:56 am
Location: Picnic Point, Sydney Australia *** Nikon D200/D70 ***

Postby spartikus on Thu Aug 04, 2005 3:07 pm

I run my monitor resolution at 1280x854 (widescreen Powerbook) and resize my images for web at 800px on the longest size with 75% compression.
Chris
photoblog
User avatar
spartikus
Member
 
Posts: 192
Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2005 2:43 pm
Location: Perth, W.A. - dee-seventy

Re: What is your preference for photo resolution?

Postby informer on Thu Aug 04, 2005 6:47 pm

Aussie Dave wrote:sorry Informer, I'm not quite following you.

Do you mean what resolution do we have our monitors set to, or what resolution do we set our photos up for (to post on the forum) ??

For me,
monitor = 1280 x 1024 (19" CRT Monitor)
photos - roughly 800-900px along longest side

(I believe the forum prefers images about 800px along longest side). Sometimes with frames, mine are a little longer :twisted:


At first I was going to say monitor resolution, but decided on preferred image resolution regardless of what monitor resolution you have.
Check out my latest - http://englishnewbies.tripod.com/blog
--------------------------------------------------
Team D50 - Honcho leader [ Japan ]
--------------------------------------------------
"Don't bother with PotW" - John Howard
User avatar
informer
Member
 
Posts: 156
Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2005 10:00 pm
Location: Tokyo, Japan

Postby informer on Thu Aug 04, 2005 6:51 pm

Thanks to those who responded.

The reason why I asked was because I find images (especially mine) better and nicer to look at when they're large, at least to my resolution. Just wondering whether you guys prefer looking at something large and in your fact, or something compact and sharp looking?

I discovered this when I was posting images to photo galleries, a lot of them would only accept pictures no bigger than 800x600 and sometimes even only 640x480. Hell some PDAs support these functions so I think its time to up the pixel counts a bit more and make it 1024x768.

I think I will change my photos to this resolution if enough people supports it.
Check out my latest - http://englishnewbies.tripod.com/blog
--------------------------------------------------
Team D50 - Honcho leader [ Japan ]
--------------------------------------------------
"Don't bother with PotW" - John Howard
User avatar
informer
Member
 
Posts: 156
Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2005 10:00 pm
Location: Tokyo, Japan

Postby Killakoala on Thu Aug 04, 2005 7:39 pm

I chose 800x600 simply because my Laptop only goes to 1024x768 and photos that large will be lost to view.
Steve.
|D700| D2H | F5 | 70-200VR | 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-70 | 10.5 | 12-24 | SB800 |
Website-> http://www.stevekilburn.com
Leeds United for promotion in 2014 - Hurrah!!!
User avatar
Killakoala
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5398
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 3:31 pm
Location: Southland NZ

Postby Onyx on Thu Aug 04, 2005 10:22 pm

Well unfortunately those well off enough to afford big monitor real estate still have to cater to the lowest common denominator, which means assuming the viewer has 800x600 res screen. There's a reason most sites place a restriction on max image size - when resolution grows filesizes grow exponentially (lowest common factor again - the dialup user, hence try to keep filesize below 100kb).

In this forum, because of the left hand column taking up a bit of space, 600 pixels wide is probably a good limit to try and stay under.
User avatar
Onyx
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3631
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 6:51 pm
Location: westsyd.nsw.au


Return to General Discussion

cron