The FishermanModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
8 posts
• Page 1 of 1
The FishermanThis was taken near Luna Park on the northern side the Bridge tour activity on Saturday, the guy pulled out a fairly sizeable fish from the end of his line (surprising as it came out of Sydney Harbour), and we D70Users made him a star.
It was with a newly discovered custom curve I shot with on the Anniversary weekend, Raszevski curve, named after its author (originally intended for the D2X). Reviewing my pics, the curve didn't work for me in alot of shots, but this one image is a standout I thought I'd share. Honest opinions sought. Do you like the tone curve? Do you like the results? Can you separate one from the other? Gear: Nikon D70, Nikkor 80-200 f/2.8@80mm. Exif: ISO200, f/11, 1/500s. Matrix metering, -1.3EV. No fill flash. IMO the curve makes the image uncharacterstic of the D70 - totally different in tone and colours, the compressed/lack of dynamic range makes it look like it was from scanned film instead. Except resizing for the web, there was no PP done on this out of camera JPEG.
Despite all the technicality explained, it looks like a happy snap to me.
Check out my latest - http://englishnewbies.tripod.com/blog
-------------------------------------------------- Team D50 - Honcho leader [ Japan ] -------------------------------------------------- "Don't bother with PotW" - John Howard
I always shoot RAW but when I bring 500+ photos from some trip I really want to minimise PP as much as I can. If you spend about 10 minutes for each photo, it'll be about 80-85 hours, 2 work weeks. I just don't have this time. So, I found curves might be useful in some situations. Onyx, This your photo looks pretty good. I tried Raszevski curve myself and I also don't like it in many situations but here it works Mikhail
Hasselblad 501CM, XPAN, Wista DX 4x5, Pentax 67, Nikon D70, FED-2
I like the shot, not sure if the curve helps or not but good use of DOF, nice blue sea and an interesting subject with good lighting, what more could you want.
http://wolfeyes.com.au Tactical Torches - Tactical Flashlights Police torch rechargeable torch military torch police military HID surefire flashlight LED torch tactical torch rechargeable wolf eyes flashlight surefire torch wolf eyes tactical torchpolice torch
Thank You
Yes, it is an ordinary snap as informer said. I was merely trying to illustrate the Raszevski curve, and that it didn't work for me.
Wade - your comments suggest a misunderstanding about tone curves. I would try to explain further, but I'll end up sounding too condescending. Here's the image reprocessed with the 'normal' tone curve. His face and hands are no longer as close to clipping and his yellow beanie seems to be more saturated too.
Previous topic • Next topic
8 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|