More Stingray shotsModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
11 posts
• Page 1 of 1
More Stingray shots1969 Corvette Stingray
Nikon D70 ,Sigma 18-50mm f/2.8 EX DC 1/500s f/10.0 at 34.0mm iso640 with Flash hand held Nikon D70 ,Sigma 18-50mm f/2.8 EX DC 1/200s f/10.0 at 18.0mm iso640 with Flash hand held my gallery of so-so photos
http://www.pbase.com/kerrypierce/
...... great pix,s...... also envy envy envy..... will he take an mgb as a trade in if the VET is up for sale.....
Cheers ....bp....
Difference between a good street photographer and a great street photographer.... Removing objects that do not belong... happy for the comments, but .....Please DO NOT edit my image..... http://bigpix.smugmug.com Forever changing
Thanks, BP. ummm, I don't think the car is for sale. Mudder: You're right, it is a very good looking car. my gallery of so-so photos
http://www.pbase.com/kerrypierce/
Ah yeah, this is a dead sexy machine!!
But, can you tell me why your ISO is so high when you seem to have good lighting and f/2.8? Still learning and any help would be appreciated. Jase - 'Motorcycle Gallery' - 'Car Gallery'
Thanks for the kind comments, guys.
Jase: The lighting was not consistent. It was a rather windy, cloudy day, which meant that the light was constantly changing. I used the higher ISO to negate some of that and to help ensure that the background shady areas were better exposed. my gallery of so-so photos
http://www.pbase.com/kerrypierce/
Great shots Kerry of a classic, i love them and well yeh would be even better to own one. Not a lot i can say about your pics that i haven't said already. i had the chance to take a couple of pics of cars the other week and well sometimes not the easiest to do at times with lighting and so on.
Anyhow was a dreary wetish sort of day but yeh here it is . i played with it.LOL Cheers D3,D2x,D70,18-70 kit lens,Sigma 70-200mm F2.8EX HSM,Nikon AF-I 300m F2.8, TC20E 2X
80-400VR,SB800,Vosonic X Drive,VP6210 40 http://www.oz-images.com
Thanks, John.
I think your shot came out very nicely, in spite of the conditions. my gallery of so-so photos
http://www.pbase.com/kerrypierce/
Thanks Kerry, look mate they are just hard to make them look anygood, except that one you been doing, can park that in my shed anyday.
Like i said some shots of cars are hard because unless they are something special, they are very plain as just another cars pic. But with these older classics it doesn't matter if it is a plain shot they are just worthless. Great cars these older models. D3,D2x,D70,18-70 kit lens,Sigma 70-200mm F2.8EX HSM,Nikon AF-I 300m F2.8, TC20E 2X
80-400VR,SB800,Vosonic X Drive,VP6210 40 http://www.oz-images.com
Previous topic • Next topic
11 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|