Lens Lust at its worst

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Lens Lust at its worst

Postby anubis on Mon Aug 15, 2005 8:36 pm

Guys,

I succumbed to Lens Lust and purchased a 70-200 VR, let me know what you think of the following Photo.....!

Taken at F2.8 @ 200mm, ISO200 I think, 1/500 Shutter. Reduced Size of whole picture for posting in Photoshop no other adjustments (e.g. lighting, sharpness etc).

Image
Nikon D300, Nikkors 70-200 VR, 17-55, 50 1.4,18-200 VR etc
User avatar
anubis
Member
 
Posts: 248
Joined: Sat Apr 16, 2005 9:05 pm
Location: Rose Bay

Postby Glen on Mon Aug 15, 2005 9:07 pm

Nice shot, I am sure you will love that lens. Try to keep your shots to 800 or under on the long side, helps those on dial up and with smaller screen sizes.
http://wolfeyes.com.au Tactical Torches - Tactical Flashlights Police torch rechargeable torch military torch police military HID surefire flashlight LED torch tactical torch rechargeable wolf eyes flashlight surefire torch wolf eyes tactical torchpolice torch
Thank You
User avatar
Glen
Moderator
 
Posts: 11819
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 3:14 pm
Location: Sydney - Neutral Bay - Nikon

Postby anubis on Mon Aug 15, 2005 9:19 pm

Thanks Glen, will keep the shot smaller next time.

Tell me guys how would you improve the shot?.
Nikon D300, Nikkors 70-200 VR, 17-55, 50 1.4,18-200 VR etc
User avatar
anubis
Member
 
Posts: 248
Joined: Sat Apr 16, 2005 9:05 pm
Location: Rose Bay

Postby kipper on Mon Aug 15, 2005 9:25 pm

Background is too busy for my liking.
Darryl (aka Kipper)
Nikon D200
kipper
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3738
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 9:23 pm
Location: Hampshire, UK

Postby Glen on Mon Aug 15, 2005 9:29 pm

Anubis, as the bird is the focus here, I would walk about five steps closer so the bird fills the frame more. Then again, the bird may fly away :)
http://wolfeyes.com.au Tactical Torches - Tactical Flashlights Police torch rechargeable torch military torch police military HID surefire flashlight LED torch tactical torch rechargeable wolf eyes flashlight surefire torch wolf eyes tactical torchpolice torch
Thank You
User avatar
Glen
Moderator
 
Posts: 11819
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 3:14 pm
Location: Sydney - Neutral Bay - Nikon

Postby kipper on Mon Aug 15, 2005 9:36 pm

Glen, that's when the lust gets the better of you and makes you want to take it to the next level :(
Darryl (aka Kipper)
Nikon D200
kipper
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3738
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 9:23 pm
Location: Hampshire, UK

Postby avkomp on Mon Aug 15, 2005 9:50 pm

I know about trying to walk a few steps closer to fill the frame.

Works with any other subject in the world.

Birds on the other hand just fly away laughing at you.
need more glass for good bird shots, and a sense of humour

Steve
User avatar
avkomp
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2485
Joined: Sun May 29, 2005 8:47 pm
Location: Bendoura NSW - Nikon D5

Postby christiand on Mon Aug 15, 2005 9:52 pm

Welcome to the VR club !

Isn't she a beauty (the 70-200VR it is)
She is also a bit weighty.
(are you getting a TC17E aswell ?)

Cheers,
CD
User avatar
christiand
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1989
Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2004 1:36 pm
Location: Tuggeranong, ACT - Canberra

Postby samester on Mon Aug 15, 2005 9:58 pm

anubis wrote:Tell me guys how would you improve the shot?.



i agree with kipper and glen, i'd concenrate on the in-focus areas and crop out the busy background.

the background detracts from the puzzled look on the birds face and i'd crop accordingly.

here's a quick, rough attempt!!


Image
samester
Member
 
Posts: 122
Joined: Mon Feb 07, 2005 10:33 pm
Location: Sydney, Penrith Area

Postby beetleboy on Mon Aug 15, 2005 10:01 pm

A few quick tips..

I know you were probably trying to blur the background with the shallow depth of field but you'll find at 200mm you can probably shoot at f5.6-8 and still have a shallow DOF but your image will have more punch and sharpness.

Also, I agree RE the composition..get a little closer, go on, sneak up!

Liam =]
User avatar
beetleboy
Senior Member
 
Posts: 821
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 4:57 am
Location: Highbury, Adelaide

Postby MATT on Mon Aug 15, 2005 10:20 pm

Must resist the lust....

At least until Next year.

Looks like you'll have lots of fun with the 70-200

MATT
User avatar
MATT
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1748
Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2004 8:24 pm
Location: Biloela, QLD-----nikon--D700-----

Postby Heath Bennett on Mon Aug 15, 2005 10:32 pm

Same lens, same bird, different sex?

Image
HB
User avatar
Heath Bennett
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1351
Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2005 8:49 pm
Location: Morisset/Bonnells Bay

Postby anubis on Mon Aug 15, 2005 10:42 pm

Guys, your not suggesting I get the 200-400 VR are you, bad influence my mother warned me about you lot in school :)

seriously ...the 1.7 Teleconverter is next on the list for me....but need to recover from the 70-200 VR first.....it took me a month to convince my fiancee to release funds.... :)

Thanks for all the tips...
Nikon D300, Nikkors 70-200 VR, 17-55, 50 1.4,18-200 VR etc
User avatar
anubis
Member
 
Posts: 248
Joined: Sat Apr 16, 2005 9:05 pm
Location: Rose Bay

Postby birddog114 on Mon Aug 15, 2005 10:51 pm

anubis wrote:it took me a month to convince my fiancee to release funds.... :)


Hehehehehe!!
Another "miserable" with fiancee, why should the best photogs get involved with these words? :lol: Can we live without it? :shock: :lol:
Be boss, be strong and be last :lol:
Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
User avatar
birddog114
Senior Member
 
Posts: 15881
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 8:18 pm
Location: Belmore,Sydney

Postby spartikus on Mon Aug 15, 2005 11:27 pm

Congrats on the new purchase, and keep posting shots!
Chris
photoblog
User avatar
spartikus
Member
 
Posts: 192
Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2005 2:43 pm
Location: Perth, W.A. - dee-seventy

Postby sirhc55 on Mon Aug 15, 2005 11:43 pm

Congrats on the purchase. Critique as per others on cropping or getting closer and I will add that it needs a contrast boost :D
Chris
--------------------------------
I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
User avatar
sirhc55
Key Member
 
Posts: 12930
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 6:57 pm
Location: Port Macquarie - Olympus EM-10

Postby Willy wombat on Tue Aug 16, 2005 12:17 am

First shot is a little bit big (i cant see the whole thing on my monitor) but nice colours. I look forward to seeing more results from the VR. Im quite envious lust.... lust..... lust
User avatar
Willy wombat
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2284
Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2005 10:47 pm
Location: Bentleigh, VIC Australia

Postby kipper on Tue Aug 16, 2005 8:17 am

Nah, as if the 200-400VR! If you're serious about nature photography you'd go a prime lens :)

As the other guys said, try getting closer, this will help with the background aswell as it will go more OOF.
Darryl (aka Kipper)
Nikon D200
kipper
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3738
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 9:23 pm
Location: Hampshire, UK

Postby birddog114 on Tue Aug 16, 2005 8:37 am

kipper wrote:Nah, as if the 200-400VR! If you're serious about nature photography you'd go a prime lens :)


Not really! prime is only good for some situations and intended purposes but not always, required lot of skills and extra bit of equipment to do with it + fiancees will shake their heads or demand a BIG diamond ring to compensate :lol: and it's their pain to shoulder :lol: Not like you, kipper! a young bachelor and you be your own boss :lol: though these fellows are not doing what you're aiming for so the zoom will help them a lot.

As the other guys said, try getting closer, this will help with the background aswell as it will go more OOF


Ask Matt.k to borrow his outfit and creep closer to the birds. :lol:
Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
User avatar
birddog114
Senior Member
 
Posts: 15881
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 8:18 pm
Location: Belmore,Sydney

Postby huynhie on Tue Aug 16, 2005 8:46 am

Birddog114 wrote:
fiancees will shake their heads or demand a BIG diamond ring to compensate :lol:



Not only fiances but wife's will also have a go at demanding big diamond rings as well. :D
User avatar
huynhie
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1476
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 12:11 pm
Location: Sydney

Postby birddog114 on Tue Aug 16, 2005 8:52 am

huynhie wrote:
Birddog114 wrote:
fiancees will shake their heads or demand a BIG diamond ring to compensate :lol:



Not only fiances but wife's will also have a go at demanding big diamond rings as well. :D


Not mine! I know how to reign my territory :lol:
Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
User avatar
birddog114
Senior Member
 
Posts: 15881
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 8:18 pm
Location: Belmore,Sydney

Postby huynhie on Tue Aug 16, 2005 8:58 am

Birddog114 wrote:
huynhie wrote:
Birddog114 wrote:
fiancees will shake their heads or demand a BIG diamond ring to compensate :lol:



Not only fiances but wife's will also have a go at demanding big diamond rings as well. :D


Not mine! I know how to reign my territory :lol:


:D It was a bad idea of me to set a precedence when I started this hobby, now I have to go with it :D BTW wife's should be wives, unfortunately it's my second language :wink:
User avatar
huynhie
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1476
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 12:11 pm
Location: Sydney

Postby robboh on Tue Aug 16, 2005 9:02 am

Congrats Anubis.
Welcome to the 70-200VR club. They have lovely bokeh dont they? Agree with the others that a crop or a foot zoom (or a TC) is in order for that pic :-)

Mine own 70-200 has FINALLY arrived back from the repair shop and so Im really looking forward to getting out for a play myself.

I got mine 2ndhand and it went straight to the shop for a new f-mount as the camera wouldnt keep contact with the lens (vendor payed for that!!). That took 6 weeks, but its back now and man is it sharp. So much sharper at wideopen / minfocus / fullzoom than my old 80-200 AFD 2touch.
Smile; it makes people wonder what you have been up to.
User avatar
robboh
Member
 
Posts: 455
Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2005 7:50 pm
Location: Auckland, New Zealand

Postby birddog114 on Tue Aug 16, 2005 9:06 am

huynhie wrote: BTW wife's should be wives, unfortunately it's my second language :wink:


Do you know how's the man run their family in the traditional of Asian way?
It'll help a lot if it can be applied here also :lol:
Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
User avatar
birddog114
Senior Member
 
Posts: 15881
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 8:18 pm
Location: Belmore,Sydney

Postby sirhc55 on Tue Aug 16, 2005 9:13 am

Solo is the only way - after 3 wifes that would have bought me thousands of D2X’s, 200-400VR’s by the bucket load and a house in Tuscany - I just love the simple life :wink: :roll: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Chris
--------------------------------
I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
User avatar
sirhc55
Key Member
 
Posts: 12930
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 6:57 pm
Location: Port Macquarie - Olympus EM-10

Postby anubis on Tue Aug 16, 2005 9:15 pm

Hey Guys,

A Diamond Ring! --- man don't tell her she hasn't asked for anything yet...maybe shes saving up credits.... :)

I will get some camo gear and sneak up on em birds.....we'll see how I go.

Thanks for all the comments, love the Bokeh from the Lens, its sensational even at f2.8 200mm.... BTW Bought the lens off Adorama 2nd Hand am very impressed.
Nikon D300, Nikkors 70-200 VR, 17-55, 50 1.4,18-200 VR etc
User avatar
anubis
Member
 
Posts: 248
Joined: Sat Apr 16, 2005 9:05 pm
Location: Rose Bay

Postby kipper on Tue Aug 16, 2005 9:19 pm

Robboh, any idea how much the f-mount cost to replace?
Darryl (aka Kipper)
Nikon D200
kipper
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3738
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 9:23 pm
Location: Hampshire, UK

Postby robboh on Wed Aug 17, 2005 10:53 am

kipper wrote:Robboh, any idea how much the f-mount cost to replace?

Kip, it was an hour's labour and $70 for the part, so 'bout $150 Kiwi all up.
Smile; it makes people wonder what you have been up to.
User avatar
robboh
Member
 
Posts: 455
Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2005 7:50 pm
Location: Auckland, New Zealand


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques